Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Bayesian approach to estimate the probability of resistance to bedaquiline in the presence of a genomic variant.
Anlay, Degefaye Zelalem; Rivière, Emmanuel; Tu, Pham Hien Trang; Abrams, Steven; Van Rie, Annelies.
Affiliation
  • Anlay DZ; School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
  • Rivière E; Global Health Institute, Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Tu PHT; Global Health Institute, Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Abrams S; Global Health Institute, Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Van Rie A; Global Health Institute, Family Medicine and Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
PLoS One ; 18(6): e0287019, 2023.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37315052
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Bedaquiline is a core drug for treatment of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis. Few genomic variants have been statistically associated with bedaquiline resistance. Alternative approaches for determining the genotypic-phenotypic association are needed to guide clinical care.

METHODS:

Using published phenotype data for variants in Rv0678, atpE, pepQ and Rv1979c genes in 756 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates and survey data of the opinion of 33 experts, we applied Bayesian methods to estimate the posterior probability of bedaquiline resistance and corresponding 95% credible intervals.

RESULTS:

Experts agreed on the role of Rv0678, and atpE, were uncertain about the role of pepQ and Rv1979c variants and overestimated the probability of bedaquiline resistance for most variant types, resulting in lower posterior probabilities compared to prior estimates. The posterior median probability of bedaquiline resistance was low for synonymous mutations in atpE (0.1%) and Rv0678 (3.3%), high for missense mutations in atpE (60.8%) and nonsense mutations in Rv0678 (55.1%), relatively low for missense (31.5%) mutations and frameshift (30.0%) in Rv0678 and low for missense mutations in pepQ (2.6%) and Rv1979c (2.9%), but 95% credible intervals were wide.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bayesian probability estimates of bedaquiline resistance given the presence of a specific mutation could be useful for clinical decision-making as it presents interpretable probabilities compared to standard odds ratios. For a newly emerging variant, the probability of resistance for the variant type and gene can still be used to guide clinical decision-making. Future studies should investigate the feasibility of using Bayesian probabilities for bedaquiline resistance in clinical practice.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genomics Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Ethiopia

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Genomics Type of study: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Language: En Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: Ethiopia