Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The consequences of limited training in disorders of gut-brain interaction: Results from a national survey of gastroenterology trainees in the United Kingdom.
Sasegbon, Ayodele; Luo, Yuying; Keefer, Laurie A; Vasant, Dipesh H.
Affiliation
  • Sasegbon A; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Luo Y; The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Keefer LA; The Henry D. Janowitz Division of Gastroenterology, The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
  • Vasant DH; Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Gastroenterology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Neurogastroenterol Motil ; 35(10): e14649, 2023 10.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37482914
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite their high prevalence and burden, disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are undertaught and underrepresented in medical curricula. We evaluated the exposure of UK gastroenterology trainees to DGBI and their comfort managing these conditions.

METHODS:

An electronic survey was distributed to trainees via UK training program directors. The survey included questions on stage of training; subspecialty interest; access to DGBI training opportunities, and comfort levels with DGBI diagnosis and management. Responses were compared between junior and senior trainees, by subspecialty interest (luminal and non-luminal), by geographical region, and training program size. KEY

RESULTS:

One hundred twelve trainees from across the UK participated (21.4% of national training post holders). Exposure to DGBI lectures (32.8% junior vs. 73.3% senior trainees, p = 0.00003) and clinics (9.0% junior vs. 42.2% senior trainees, p = 0.00003), increased with seniority. Regardless of seniority, most trainees were rarely comfortable making a DGBI diagnosis (39.5% senior vs. 33.9% junior trainees, p = 0.69), and were not comfortable initiating neuromodulators (50% senior vs. 25.8% junior trainees, p = 0.08). Trainees without a luminal subspecialty interest (50%) accessed fewer DGBI clinics (p = 0.04), had less communication skills training (p = 0.04) and were less likely to have been observed during DGBI consultations (p = 0.002). Responses were similar across UK regions and did not differ between smaller and larger programs. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES DGBI training opportunities are limited in UK gastroenterology training across training grades. Most trainees lack confidence with DGBI diagnosis and management. Urgent interventions need to be targeted at all stages of training to ensure DGBI competencies for future gastroenterologists and improve patient outcomes.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastroenterology Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastroenterology Type of study: Risk_factors_studies Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: En Journal: Neurogastroenterol Motil Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEUROLOGIA Year: 2023 Type: Article Affiliation country: United kingdom