Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Paravertebral Nerve Block for Procedural Pain in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty.
Kang, Min-Seok; Son, In-Seok; Kim, Tae-Hoon; Lee, Suk-Ha; You, Ki-Han; Lee, Woo-Myung; Hyun, Jin-Tak; Park, Hyun-Jin.
Affiliation
  • Kang MS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Anam Hospital.
  • Son IS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jeju University Medical Center, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim TH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine.
  • Lee SH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University School of Medicine.
  • You KH; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Seoul.
  • Lee WM; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Seoul.
  • Hyun JT; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Seoul.
  • Park HJ; Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical College, Seoul.
Clin J Pain ; 40(2): 92-98, 2024 Feb 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37982510
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to unidimensionally measure procedural pain at each percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) stage and evaluate the effectiveness of paravertebral nerve block (PVNB) in reducing procedural pain.

METHODS:

A retrospective study of prospectively collected data was conducted on 66 patients who underwent PVP for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The patients were divided into 2 groups group A (fluoroscopic-guided PVNB; 5 cm 3 of 0.75% ropivacaine on each side) and group B (local anesthesia). To investigate procedural pain associated with PVP, the visual analog scale score was assessed at each surgical stage before the incision (stage 1), transpedicular approach (stage 2), and polymethylmethacrylate cement injection (stage 3). After the procedure, patients were asked about their surgical experience and satisfaction using the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale. Periprocedural complications were also recorded.

RESULTS:

A total of 63 patients (78.65 y of age) were finally enrolled 30 from group A and 33 from group B. In both groups, a significant ≥2-point increase in procedural pain was observed during PVP compared with that during stage 1 ( P < 0.001). In stages 2 and 3, the pain intensity was significantly lower in group A ( P < 0.001). Upon discharge, the visual analog scale score improved in all groups; however, the Iowa Satisfaction with Anesthesia Scale score was significantly higher in group A ( P < 0.001). There was no difference in periprocedural complications between the two groups ( P = 0.743).

CONCLUSION:

PVP causes significant procedural pain, and PVNB is a potentially effective modality for enhancing patient satisfaction and reducing procedural pain.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Fractures, Compression / Vertebroplasty / Osteoporotic Fractures / Pain, Procedural / Nerve Block Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Spinal Fractures / Fractures, Compression / Vertebroplasty / Osteoporotic Fractures / Pain, Procedural / Nerve Block Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Clin J Pain Journal subject: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article