Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The role of digital mammographic surveillance for detection of asymptomatic recurrence in autologous flap reconstructions.
Hastings-Robinson, Ashley; Chung, Maggie; Hayward, Jessica H; Ray, Kimberly M; Price, Elissa R; Navarro, Ryan; Joe, Bonnie N; Lee, Amie Y.
Affiliation
  • Hastings-Robinson A; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Chung M; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Hayward JH; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Ray KM; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Price ER; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Navarro R; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Joe BN; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA.
  • Lee AY; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, USA. Electronic address: Amie.Lee2@ucsf.edu.
Clin Imaging ; 106: 110062, 2024 Feb.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38128403
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the utility of digital mammography in detecting asymptomatic malignancy in autologous flap reconstructions after mastectomy.

METHODS:

A retrospective database review identified all mammograms performed on asymptomatic patients with flap reconstructions over a 9-year period (1/1/2009 to 12/31/2017). A negative examination was defined as BI-RADS 1 or 2 and a positive examination was defined as BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5 assigned to the mastectomy side. Malignant outcomes were determined by pathology results. Interval cancers, or false negatives, were defined as locoregional malignant diagnosis within one year of a negative mammogram. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, abnormal interpretation rate, and cancer detection rate were calculated.

RESULTS:

626 mammograms of asymptomatic flap reconstructions were performed in 183 patients. The most common flap type was TRAM (83.5 %, 523/626) and DIEP (13.4 %, 84/626). Most exams (98.2 %, 615/626) were negative, assessed as BI-RADS 1 or 2, with no interval cancers at follow-up. Eleven exams (1.8 %, 11/626) were positive, assessed as BI-RADS 0, 4, or 5. After diagnostic work-up of all BI-RADS 0 exams, 9 cases had a final recommendation for biopsy of which 3 were malignant. Mammography yielded a cancer detection rate of 0.5 % (3/626), abnormal interpretation rate of 1.8 % (11/626), NPV of 100 % (615/615), overall PPV of 27.3 % (3/11), PPV2 (positive predictive value of a biopsy recommendation) of 33.3 % (3/9), sensitivity of 100 % (3/3), and specificity of 98.7 % (615/623).

CONCLUSION:

Digital mammography of asymptomatic autologous flap reconstructions after mastectomy demonstrated high sensitivity and low abnormal interpretation rate. Cancer detection rate was comparable to current national benchmarks for mammographic screening in the general U.S. population without mastectomy.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammaplasty Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Breast Neoplasms / Mammaplasty Limits: Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Clin Imaging Journal subject: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States