Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Masticatory function in edentulous patients wearing implant overdentures after graftless maxillary sinus membrane elevation.
Lie, Suen A N; Speksnijder, Caroline M; Kalic, Haris; Kessler, Peter A W H.
Affiliation
  • Lie SAN; Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Speksnijder CM; Maastricht University Medical Center, GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kalic H; Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
  • Kessler PAWH; University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery and Special Dental Care, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Oral Rehabil ; 51(6): 1005-1015, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38475939
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Graftless sinus floor augmentation shows good results in bone gain, radiology and implant survival. Clinically, this technique can be recommended as an alternative to conventional procedures using augmentation materials.

OBJECTIVES:

This study aims to assess masticatory performance, masticatory ability and patient satisfaction after graftless sinus floor augmentation.

METHODS:

The study group consisted of patients who had received a graftless sinus lift procedure in a split-mouth design and was compared to patients with maxillary implant-supported overdentures without augmentation and a natural dentition group. To assess objective masticatory performance, the mixing ability test was performed. Three questionnaires were used to assess patient reported outcomes related to mastication and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS:

Each group included ten patients. Both the graftless sinus lift group and the edentulous control group had a worse masticatory performance compared to the natural dentition group. Masticatory ability, measured by patient reported outcomes, was not different between the graftless sinus floor augmentation group and implant-retained overdentures group without augmentation, but the natural dentition group showed better results. Thereby, the better the masticatory performance in patients with a graftless sinus membrane elevation the better the patient satisfaction for 'prosthesis', 'appearance of prostheses', 'speech' and 'mastication and eating'.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with implant-supported overdentures show inferior masticatory function compared to those with natural dentition. There were no significant differences in masticatory performance between patients with implant-retained overdentures, with or without graftless augmentation. The decision on the preferred procedure should consider additional factors such as anatomical, surgical-technical aspects and patient's preferences.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Satisfaction / Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / Denture, Overlay / Sinus Floor Augmentation / Mastication Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Oral Rehabil Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Satisfaction / Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported / Denture, Overlay / Sinus Floor Augmentation / Mastication Limits: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: J Oral Rehabil Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands