Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of sodium valproate versus levetiracetam in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury.
Huang, Xiaolei; Lin, Wenjia; Wang, Jiayin; Liu, Chubin; Wei, Guan; Wang, Jiawei; Wang, Chaoyang.
Affiliation
  • Huang X; Department of Emergency, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Lin W; Department of Emergency, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Liu C; Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Wei G; Department of Emergency, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Wang J; Department of Emergency, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
  • Wang C; Department of Emergency, The Second Attached Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, Fujian, China.
Int J Neurosci ; : 1-10, 2024 Mar 27.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497924
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To observe the efficacy and safety of sodium valproate (VPA) compared to levetiracetam (LEV) in the treatment of severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI).

METHODS:

In this blind, prospective study, eighty-four sTBI patients who had craniotomy from August 2021 to August 2023 were randomly split into two groups through random number table

method:

LEV and VPA, each with 42 patients. Both received comprehensive treatment post-craniotomy. LEV group LEV injection on surgery day, transitioning to LEV tablets from day two. VPA group VPA injection on surgery day, switching to VPA extended-release tablets from day two. The study compared hospital stay, neurological function, clinical outcomes, seizures, and drug reactions between groups.

RESULTS:

The length of hospital stay showed no significant difference between the LEV and VPA groups. Both groups demonstrated improved neurological function post-treatment (NIHSS and BI scores), with no significant between-group differences. Clinical outcomes at 3 months post-treatment were similar in both groups. Seizure occurrence within 3 months after treatment showed no significant difference between the LEV (19.05%) and VPA (23.81%) groups. However, the VPA group experienced a significantly higher rate of drug-related adverse reactions (40.48%) compared to the LEV group (21.43%).

CONCLUSION:

Both VPA and LEV are effective in treating sTBI, showing no significant difference in improving neurological function, daily life abilities, treatment outcomes, and seizure occurrence. However, VPA treatment exhibited a significantly higher incidence of drug-related adverse reactions compared to LEV, indicating that LEV might be a safer option for sTBI treatment.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Neurosci Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Int J Neurosci Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China