Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Follow-up of urolithiasis patients after treatment: an algorithm from the EAU Urolithiasis Panel.
Lombardo, Riccardo; Tzelves, Lazaros; Geraghty, Robert; Davis, Niall F; Neisius, Andreas; Petrík, Ales; Gambaro, Giovanni; Türk, Christian; Somani, Bhaskar; Thomas, Kay; Skolarikos, Andreas.
Affiliation
  • Lombardo R; Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Tzelves L; National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Chairman of the EAU Urolithiasis Guidelines, Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Geraghty R; Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Davis NF; Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Neisius A; Department of Urology, Connolly Hospital, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
  • Petrík A; Department of Urology, Hospital of the Brothers of Mercy Trier, Medical Campus University Mainz, Trier, Germany.
  • Gambaro G; Department of Urology, Region Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
  • Türk C; Department of Urology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
  • Somani B; Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Thomas K; Department of Urology, Hospital of the Sisters of Charity, Vienna, Austria.
  • Skolarikos A; Urologische Praxis, Vienna, Austria.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 202, 2024 Mar 28.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546854
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To develop a follow-up algorithm for urinary stone patients after definitive treatment. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

The panel performed a systematic review on follow-up of urinary stone patients after treatment (PROSPERO CRD42020205739). Given the lack of comparative studies we critically evaluated the literature and reached a consensus on the follow-up scheme.

RESULTS:

A total of 76 studies were included in the analysis, including 17 RCTs. In the stone-free general population group, 71-100% of patients are stone-free at 12 months while 29-94% remain stone-free at 36 months. We propose counselling these patients on imaging versus discharge after the first year. The stone-free rate in high-risk patients not receiving targeted medical therapy is < 40% at 36 months, a fact that supports imaging, metabolic, and treatment monitoring follow-up once a year. Patients with residual fragments ≤ 4 mm have a spontaneous expulsion rate of 18-47% and a growth rate of 10-41% at 12 months, supporting annual imaging follow-up. Patients with residual fragments > 4 mm should be considered for surgical re-intervention based on the low spontaneous expulsion rate (13% at 1 year) and high risk of recurrence. Plain film KUB and/or kidney ultrasonography based on clinicians' preference and stone characteristics is the preferred imaging follow-up. Computed tomography should be considered if patient is symptomatic or intervention is planned.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on evidence from the systematic review we propose, for the first time, a follow-up algorithm for patients after surgical stone treatment balancing the risks of stone recurrence against the burden of radiation from imaging studies.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Urolithiasis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World J Urol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Algorithms / Urolithiasis Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: World J Urol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Italy