Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Conversion Rate of Abstracts Presented at Plastic Surgery The Meeting From 2010 to 2019: A 10-Year Analysis of Factors for Success.
Vishwanath, Neel; Cummings, Olivia W; Lim, Justin; Kulkarni, Shreyas; Sobti, Nikhil; O'Toole, Daniel; Bhatt, Reena; Kalliainen, Loree K.
Affiliation
  • Vishwanath N; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Ann Plast Surg ; 92(4S Suppl 2): S298-S304, 2024 Apr 01.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38556693
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Presentations are an important means of knowledge generation. Publication of these studies is important for dissemination of findings beyond meeting attendees. We analyzed a 10-year sample of presented abstracts at Plastic Surgery The Meeting and describe factors that improve rate and speed of conversion to peer-reviewed publication.

METHODS:

Abstracts presented between 2010 and 2019 at Plastic Surgery The Meeting were sourced from the American Society of Plastic Surgery Abstract Archive. A random sample of 100 abstracts from each year was evaluated. Abstract information and demographics were recorded. The title or author and keywords of each abstract were searched using a standardized workflow to find a corresponding published paper on PubMed, Google Scholar, and Google. Data were analyzed for trends and factors affecting conversion rate.

RESULTS:

A total of 983 presented abstracts were included. The conversion rate was 54.1%. Residents and fellows constituted the largest proportion of presenters (38.4%). There was a significant increase in medical student and research fellow presenters during the study period (P < 0.001). Conversion rate was not affected by the research rank of a presenter's affiliated institution (ß = 1.001, P = 0.89), geographic location (P = 0.60), or subspecialty tract (P = 0.73). US academics had a higher conversion rate (61.8%) than US nonacademics (32.7%) or international presenters (47.1%) (P < 0.001). Medical students had the highest conversion rate (65.6%); attendings had the lowest (45.0%). Research fellows had the lowest average time to publication (11.6 months, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS:

Lower levels of training, factors associated with increased institution-level support, and research quality affect rate and time to publication. These findings highlight the success of current models featuring medical student and research fellow-led projects with strong resident and faculty mentorship.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Plastic Surgery Procedures Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Plast Surg Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgery, Plastic / Plastic Surgery Procedures Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Ann Plast Surg Year: 2024 Type: Article