Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in the oldest old is safe: the race is run.
Ergüder, E; Verkade, C; Wasowicz, D K; Langenhoff, B S; Altiner, S; Zimmerman, D D E.
Affiliation
  • Ergüder E; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Verkade C; Department of Surgery, H. S. U. Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
  • Wasowicz DK; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Langenhoff BS; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Altiner S; Department of Surgery, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
  • Zimmerman DDE; Department of Surgery, H. S. U. Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye.
Tech Coloproctol ; 28(1): 46, 2024 Apr 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38613697
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is considered to be the gold standard for managing rectal prolapse. Nevertheless, concerns have been expressed about the use of this procedure in elderly patients. The aim of the current study was to examine the perioperative safety of primary LVMR operations in the oldest old in comparison to younger individuals and to assess our hospital policy of offering LVMR to all patients, regardless of age and morbidity.

METHODS:

A retrospective study analysed demographic information, operation notes, meshes utilised, operation times, lengths of hospital stay (LOS) and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores of patients who underwent LVMR at Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital between 2012 and 2023.

RESULTS:

Eighty-seven female patients underwent LVMR. Nineteen patients were 80 years of age or older (OLD group); the remaining 65 patients were under the age of 80 (YOUNG group). The difference between the groups in terms of age was statistically significant. ASA scores were not significantly different. No mortality was observed. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of LOS, operation time or morbidity. Moreover, the postoperative morbidity profile was excellent in both groups.

CONCLUSION:

LVMR seems to be a safe operation for the "oldest old" patients with comorbidity, despite a single-centre, retrospective trial with limited follow-up. The present study suggests abandoning the dogma that "frail patients with rectal prolapse are not suitable for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy."
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Rectal Prolapse / Laparoscopy Limits: Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Tech Coloproctol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Rectal Prolapse / Laparoscopy Limits: Aged80 / Female / Humans Language: En Journal: Tech Coloproctol Journal subject: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Netherlands