Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Management of Uncomplicated Appendicitis in Adults: A Nationwide Analysis From 2018 to 2019.
Korah, Maria; Tennakoon, Lakshika; Knowlton, Lisa M; Tung, Jamie; Spain, David A; Ko, Ara.
Affiliation
  • Korah M; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Tennakoon L; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Knowlton LM; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Tung J; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Spain DA; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
  • Ko A; Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: ara.ko@cshs.org.
J Surg Res ; 298: 307-315, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640616
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis (UA) has been increasingly utilized in recent years. The aim of this study was to describe nationwide trends of sociodemographic characteristics, outcomes, and costs of patients undergoing medical versus surgical management for UA.

METHODS:

The 2018-2019 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample was queried for adults (age ≥18 y) with UA; diagnosis, as well as laparoscopic and open appendectomy, were defined by the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. We examined several characteristics, including cost of care and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS:

Among the 167,125 patients with UA, 137,644 (82.4%) underwent operative management and 29,481 (17.6%) underwent NOM. In bivariate analysis, we found that patients who had NOM were older (53 versus 43 y, P < 0.001) and more likely to have Medicare (33.6% versus 16.1%, P < 0.001), with higher prevalence of comorbidities such as diabetes (7.8% versus 5.5%, P < 0.001). The majority of NOM patients were treated at urban teaching hospitals (74.5% versus 66.3%, P < 0.001). They had longer LOS's (5.4 versus 2.3 d, P < 0.001) with higher inpatient costs ($15,584 versus $11,559, P < 0.001) than those who had an appendectomy. Through logistic regression we found that older patients had up to 4.03-times greater odds of undergoing NOM (95% CI 3.22-5.05, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

NOM of UA is more commonly utilized in patients with comorbidities, older age, and those treated in teaching hospitals. This may, however, come at the price of longer length of stay and higher costs. Further guidelines need to be developed to clearly delineate which patients could benefit from NOM.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Appendectomy / Appendicitis / Length of Stay Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Surg Res Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Appendectomy / Appendicitis / Length of Stay Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Country/Region as subject: America do norte Language: En Journal: J Surg Res Year: 2024 Type: Article