Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Does electrophysical agents work for cellulite treatment? a systematic review of clinical trials.
Longano, Cláudia; de Faria Coelho, Carly; Buslik, Sandra Alencar; Foguel, Cicelina; Katsuragi, Camila; Leonardo, Patrícia Sardinha; Lopes-Martins, Rodrigo Álvaro Brandão.
Affiliation
  • Longano C; Bioengineering - Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • de Faria Coelho C; Laboratory of Biophotonics and Experimental Therapeutics, Universidade Evangélica de Goiás, Unievangélica. Av. Universitária Km 3,5, Anápolis, Goiás, Brasil.
  • Buslik SA; Bioengineering - Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Foguel C; Bioengineering - Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Katsuragi C; Bioengineering - Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.
  • Leonardo PS; Laboratório de Tecnologias Em Saúde, LATES, Universidade Evangélica de Goiás, Unievangélica. Av. Universitária Km 3,5, Anápolis, Goiás, Brasil.
  • Lopes-Martins RÁB; Bioengineering - Universidade Brasil, Rua Carolina Fonseca 235, Itaquera, São Paulo, SP, Brasil. ralopesmartins@gmail.com.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 120, 2024 May 02.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695965
ABSTRACT
Cellulite, a perceived alteration in skin topography, is predominantly found in adipose tissue-rich body regions such as the hips, buttocks, thighs, and abdomen. Contrary to common belief, the etiology and pathophysiology of cellulite are not well-established or universally agreed upon. This lack of understanding about the actual etiology of cellulite directly influences the selection of suitable treatments that can address both the aesthetic and inflammatory aspects of the condition. Various treatment methods, including electrophysical agents like electric currents, radiofrequency, ultrasound, and photobiomodulation, have been tested. However, the questionable methodological quality of many studies complicates the determination of effective treatments for cellulite. In this study, we conducted a systematic review of clinical studies that utilized electrophysical agents in cellulite treatment.

METHODS:

We employed the PICO (population, intervention, control, and outcome) process to develop our search strategy and establish inclusion/exclusion criteria. We searched five databases Medline, Central, Scopus, Lilacs, and PEDro, for studies conducted between 2001 and July 2021 that involved cellulite treatment with electrophysical agents. To ensure systematicity and guide study selection, we adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS:

Our initial search yielded 556 articles 379 from Medline, 159 from Central, and 18 from Lilacs. After applying our inclusion criteria, only 32 studies remained. Of these, only two (6.2%) were evaluated as having strong and good methodology via the QualSyst tool.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings indicate that the quality of evidence from clinical studies on the use of electrophysical agents for cellulite treatment remains subpar. Further studies with robust experimental designs and more precise assessment techniques are necessary. While our study does not refute the effectiveness of the techniques used for cellulite treatment, it underscores the need for additional well-designed trials.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cellulite Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lasers Med Sci Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cellulite Limits: Humans Language: En Journal: Lasers Med Sci Journal subject: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Brazil