Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effectiveness and Optimal Timing of PEG-rhG-CSF After Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation: A Multicenter Experience.
Li, Sen; Li, Jiangtao; Yang, Ping; Dong, Fei; Liu, Hui; Jing, Hongmei.
Affiliation
  • Li S; Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191 China.
  • Li J; Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China.
  • Yang P; Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191 China.
  • Dong F; Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191 China.
  • Liu H; Department of Hematology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, 100730 China.
  • Jing H; Department of Hematology, Lymphoma Research Center, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191 China.
Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus ; 40(2): 190-195, 2024 Apr.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708162
ABSTRACT
No consensus has been made on the use of PEG-modification recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) in patients receiving autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PEG-rhG-CSF in provision of neutrophil support for lymphoma patients receiving autologous PBSCT. This retrospective study included lymphoma patients receiving either PEG-rhG-CSF or rhG-CSF after autologous PBSCT from 2018 to 2021 in two clinics. Hematologic recovery time, incidence of infectious complications and toxicity were compared between these two rhG-CSFs and among different initiation time of PEG-rhG-CSF. Of the 139 subjects included, 93 received PEG-rhG-CSF and 46 received rhG-CSF after transplantation. Compared with rhG-CSF, PEG-rhG-CSF marginally but significantly accelerated the neutrophil engraftment by 1 day (10 vs. 9 days, respectively) with no increasing on the risk of infectious complication and toxicity. In the PEG-rhG-CSF group, 50 patients received the growth factor on day 1, 19 received on day 3 and 24 received on day 5. The neutrophil engraftment was significantly shorter in day 1 and day 3 subgroup (9, 9, and 10 days, respectively), with a lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (82%, 100%, 100%) and documented infections (76%, 100%, 100%) in day 1 subgroup. PEG-rhG-CSF might be an alternative to rhG-CSF for lymphoma patients received autologous PBSCT. Administrating PEG-rhG-CSF on day 1 can achieve both faster hematologic recovery and lower infectious complications. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12288-023-01704-8.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus Year: 2024 Type: Article