Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness and safety of medication abortion via telemedicine versus in-person: A cohort of pregnant people in Colombia.
Cely-Andrade, Leonardo; Cárdenas-Garzón, Karen; Enríquez-Santander, Luis C; Saavedra-Avendano, Biani; Ortiz-Avendano, Guillermo A; Betancourt-Rojas, Lucy A; Guerrero-Conde, Jorge G.
Affiliation
  • Cely-Andrade L; Clinical Research Coordinator, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia. Electronic address: jlcelya@unal.edu.co.
  • Cárdenas-Garzón K; Clinical Research Analyst, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Enríquez-Santander LC; Clinical Research Analyst, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Saavedra-Avendano B; Ipas Latin America and the Caribbean, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Ortiz-Avendano GA; Ipas Latin America and the Caribbean, North Caroline, United States.
  • Betancourt-Rojas LA; Health Information System Coordinator, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.
  • Guerrero-Conde JG; Clinical Quality Management Director, Profamilia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Contraception ; : 110514, 2024 Jun 13.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879070
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the effectiveness and safety of medication abortion (MAB) via telemedicine versus in-person in pregnant people with less than 12 gestational weeks in Colombia. STUDY

DESIGN:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted with 23,362 pregnant people who requested MAB service from Profamilia (a Colombian non-governmental organization) in 2021-2022. The outcomes were success and safety of MAB. We performed a descriptive and a multivariate statistical analysis using the binary regression model to obtain an adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) to identify factors associated with abortion success.

RESULTS:

In comparison to in-person care (n = 20,289), individuals in telemedicine (n = 3073) were predominantly from urban areas, belonged to a lower socioeconomic stratum, single and did not identify with any ethnic group. In-person users tended to have higher levels of education and accessed the service through private insurance (p < 0,05). There were no differences in the odd of a successful abortion based on the modality of care (aOR 1.18; 95% CI=0.87-1.59). The results were also the same with sensitivity analysis stratified pregnant people who were nine weeks gestation or less (aOR 0.86; 95% CI=0.63-1.17) or more (aOR 0.87; 95% CI=0.28-2.65).

CONCLUSION:

Telemedicine is an effective and safe option for MAB, as in-person care. Telemedicine has the potential to increase abortion access by extending the availability of providers and offering people a new option for obtaining care conveniently and privately, especially for women with disadvantaged socioeconomic and educational background. IMPLICATIONS This study demonstrates that medication abortion (MAB) administered via telemedicine produces outcomes akin to those of in-person care, providing a compelling rationale for its adoption, particularly in underserved regions. This approach can be replicated in other countries in Latin America and the Caribbean.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia Language: En Journal: Contraception Year: 2024 Type: Article

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Country/Region as subject: America do sul / Colombia Language: En Journal: Contraception Year: 2024 Type: Article