Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Relationship between reasons for intermittent missing patient-reported outcomes data and missing data mechanisms.
Nielsen, Lene Kongsgaard; Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca; Möller, Sören; Redder, Louise; Jarden, Mary; Andersen, Christen Lykkegaard; Frederiksen, Henrik; Svirskaite, Asta; Silkjær, Trine; Steffensen, Morten Saaby; Pedersen, Per Trøllund; Hinge, Maja; Frederiksen, Mikael; Jensen, Bo Amdi; Helleberg, Carsten; Mylin, Anne Kærsgaard; Abildgaard, Niels; King, Madeleine T.
Affiliation
  • Nielsen LK; Department of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. lene.kongsgaard.nielsen@rsyd.dk.
  • Mercieca-Bebber R; Section of Haematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark. lene.kongsgaard.nielsen@rsyd.dk.
  • Möller S; University of Sydney, NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Redder L; OPEN, Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Jarden M; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Andersen CL; Department of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Frederiksen H; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Svirskaite A; Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Silkjær T; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Steffensen MS; Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Pedersen PT; Department of Public Health, Research Unit for General Practice and Section of General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Hinge M; Department of Haematology, Quality of Life Research Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Frederiksen M; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
  • Jensen BA; Department of Haematology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
  • Helleberg C; Department of Haematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Mylin AK; Section of Haematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
  • Abildgaard N; Department of Haematology, South West Jutland Hospital, Esbjerg, Denmark.
  • King MT; Department of Haematology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark.
Qual Life Res ; 33(9): 2387-2400, 2024 Sep.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879861
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Non-response (NR) to patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires may cause bias if not handled appropriately. Collecting reasons for NR is recommended, but how reasons for NR are related to missing data mechanisms remains unexplored. We aimed to explore this relationship for intermittent NRs.

METHODS:

Patients with multiple myeloma completed validated PRO questionnaires at enrolment and 12 follow-up time-points. NR was defined as non-completion of a follow-up assessment within seven days, which triggered contact with the patient, recording the reason for missingness and an invitation to complete the questionnaire (denoted "salvage response"). Mean differences between salvage and previous on-time scores were estimated for groups defined by reasons for NR using linear regression with clustered standard errors. Statistically significant mean differences larger than minimal important difference thresholds were interpreted as "missing not at random" (MNAR) mechanism (i.e. assumed to be related to declining health), and the remainder interpreted as aligned with "missing completely at random" (MCAR) mechanism (i.e. assumed unrelated to changes in health).

RESULTS:

Most (7228/7534 (96%)) follow-up questionnaires were completed; 11% (802/7534) were salvage responses. Mean salvage scores were compared to previous on-time scores by reason those due to hospital admission, mental or physical reasons were worse in 10/22 PRO domains; those due to technical difficulties/procedural errors were no different in 21/22 PRO domains; and those due to overlooked/forgotten or other/unspecified reasons were no different in any domains.

CONCLUSION:

Intermittent NRs due to hospital admission, mental or physical reasons were aligned with MNAR mechanism for nearly half of PRO domains, while intermittent NRs due to technical difficulties/procedural errors or other/unspecified reasons generally were aligned with MCAR mechanism.
Subject(s)
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Multiple Myeloma Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Patient Reported Outcome Measures / Multiple Myeloma Limits: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: En Journal: Qual Life Res Journal subject: REABILITACAO / TERAPEUTICA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Denmark