Microelectrode Recording During Deep Brain Stimulation Does Not Consistently Represent Lead Trajectory.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Long-term outcomes in deep brain stimulation (DBS) depend on accuracy of lead placement. Microelectrode recording (MER) is a long-used adjunct to leverage neurophysiological information to confirm satisfactory trajectory of implanted electrodes. The goal of this study was to evaluate the consistency in which electrodes are placed in sampled microelectrode trajectories. METHODS: This is a retrospective study using intraoperative computed tomography to measure final electrode deviation from MER probe placement during the DBS insertion targeting subthalamic nucleus. Fifteen patients had 29 DBS leads placed using MER assistance. Radial distance between the probe and the lead were measured for each patient using intraoperative imaging. In addition, the preoperative target to final lead error was measured in 14 patients undergoing subthalamic nucleus implants without the use of MER and compared with the 15 patients in which MER was used as an adjunct. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean radial target error (1.2 vs 1.0 mm, P = .156) when comparing the leads placed with or without MER assistance, respectively. The mean difference in final position of microelectrode compared with DBS lead was 0.9 ± 0.1 (range 0.4-2.0 mm). Of all MER-assisted electrodes placed, 44.8% (13) of electrode final positions radially deviated 1.0 mm or more from the MER probe. CONCLUSION: Electrode placement may deviate significantly from MER trajectories. Given the concern that physiological data may not be representative of the final electrode trajectory, surgeons should consider using intraoperative imaging or other adjunctive techniques during DBS to confirm accuracy and satisfactory trajectory of DBS leads.