Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of the ERAS guidelines in pediatric urological surgery: a systematic review.
Stangl-Kremser, Judith; Olivera, Laura; Giudici, Sofia; Pradere, Benjamin; Mertens, Laura S; Albisinni, Simone; Laukhtina, Ekaterina; Del Giudice, Francesco; Afferi, Luca; Soria, Francesco; Sforza, Simone; O'Kelly, Fardod; Lammers, Rianne J; Silay, Mesrur S; Minervini, Andrea; Masieri, Lorenzo; Akhavan, Ardavan; 't Hoen, Lisette A; Moschini, Marco; Mari, Andrea.
Affiliation
  • Stangl-Kremser J; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Olivera L; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Giudici S; Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Pradere B; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Mertens LS; Department of Urology UROSUD, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France.
  • Albisinni S; Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Laukhtina E; Unit of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
  • Del Giudice F; Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
  • Afferi L; Department of Maternal Infant and Urologic Sciences, Umberto I Polyclinic Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
  • Soria F; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland.
  • Sforza S; Urology Division, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  • O'Kelly F; Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Lammers RJ; Division of Pediatric Urology, Beacon Hospital, University College, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Silay MS; Department of Urology, University Medical Center, Groningen, the Netherlands.
  • Minervini A; Division of Pediatric Urology, Department of Urology, Istanbul Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Masieri L; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Akhavan A; Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • 't Hoen LA; Department of Pediatric Urology, Meyer Children Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
  • Moschini M; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Mari A; Department of Pediatric Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Minerva Urol Nephrol ; 76(3): 271-277, 2024 Jun.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38920008
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Consensus for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in pediatrics has been achieved in neonatal intestinal surgery, yet it is not widely utilized in pediatric urology. We investigated the application of ERAS guidelines in pediatric urology, and determined its effects given the available level of evidence supporting the ERAS protocol in children. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic literature review including series providing adoption of fast-track recovery protocols for pediatric urology procedures was carried out. Main outcome measures were study characteristics, adherence to the 19 ERAS items, complication rates and length of hospital stay. Sub-group analysis by surgery type (hypospadias versus major surgery) was performed. EVIDENCE

SYNTHESIS:

Nine series with data from 1272 surgical pediatric cases were included. An enhanced recovery pathway was applied in 67.3% of the reports. Two series included patients undergoing hypospadias repair and ERAS items were insufficiently reported. Studies including children undergoing major procedures mentioned a median of 15 ERAS items, yet applied a median of 11 items. Median compliance rate was 88.9% (range 50-100). More ERAS guideline items were reported (applied or mentioned) in the most recently published studies.

CONCLUSIONS:

There is limited reporting and use of the ERAS guidelines in urologic surgery particularly in hypospadias repair; whilst in major surgery in children, adherence and compliance rates vary widely. In more recent series there was an increase in ERAS items that have been mentioned and applied. Future research is needed to identify barriers and to overcome them in order to fully adopt and benefit from the ERAS pathway.
Subject(s)

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Surgical Procedures / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Guideline Adherence / Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Minerva Urol Nephrol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Urologic Surgical Procedures / Practice Guidelines as Topic / Guideline Adherence / Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Limits: Child / Humans Language: En Journal: Minerva Urol Nephrol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: United States