Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Luteal phase support with oral progesterone improves live birth rate in intrauterine insemination cycles using letrozole.
Xi, Qianwen; Liao, Maokun; Wang, Yingjie; Wang, Bian; Wang, Yun; Kuang, Yanping.
Affiliation
  • Xi Q; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Liao M; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang B; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Wang Y; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: sammy20080228@icloud.com.
  • Kuang Y; Department of Assisted Reproduction, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. Electronic address: Kuangyp1506@sh9hospital.org.cn.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 49(4): 104077, 2024 May 09.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047319
ABSTRACT
RESEARCH QUESTION Does luteal phase support (LPS) with oral progesterone improve the live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with letrozole?

DESIGN:

This retrospective cohort study included 1199 IUI cycles with letrozole between January 2017 and December 2021. A nearest neighbour random matching approach was employed to pair the LPS group and the control group in a 12 ratio. Eight variables were chosen for matching in the propensity score matching (PSM) model age; body mass index; duration of infertility; cause(s) of infertility; antral follicle count; basal concentration of FSH; rank of IUI attempts; and leading follicle size. LBR was selected as the primary outcome.

RESULTS:

In total, 427 LPS cycles were matched with 772 non-LPS (control) cycles after PSM. The LBR was significantly higher in the LPS group compared with the control group (19.7% versus 14.5%; P = 0.0255). The clinical pregnancy rate (23.2% versus 17.6%; P = 0.0245) and ongoing pregnancy rate (20.6% versus 15.8%; P = 0.0437) were also significantly higher in the LPS group. The biochemical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The intergroup comparison revealed no significant variances in terms of gestational age, mode of delivery, ectopic pregnancy rate or abortion rate. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in birth weight or birth length between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS:

Luteal support with oral progesterone significantly improved the LBR in IUI cycles with letrozole, but did not affect neonatal outcomes.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Journal subject: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: China