Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis on utilizing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as a second-line treatment for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Asghar, Kanwal; Zafar, Maryam; Holland, Eva; Abduljabbar, Ali Bin; Albagoush, Sara A; Asghar, Noureen; Sood, Akshat; Dufani, Jalal M; Thirumalaredy, Joseph; DeVrieze, Bradley; Tauseef, Abubakar; Husnain, Muhammad.
Affiliation
  • Asghar K; Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Zafar M; Department of Medicine, Dow Medical College, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Holland E; School of Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Abduljabbar AB; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Albagoush SA; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Asghar N; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Sood A; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Dufani JM; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Thirumalaredy J; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • DeVrieze B; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Tauseef A; Department of Internal Medicine, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
  • Husnain M; Department of Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Front Oncol ; 14: 1407001, 2024.
Article in En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091918
ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Inconsistent results observed in recent phase III trials assessing chimeric antigenic receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy as a second-line treatment compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) prompted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in this setting.

Methods:

Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for comparison between CAR-T cell therapy and SOC. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach.

Results:

Meta-analysis of three trials with 865 patients showed significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.27-0.97; I2 92%), progression-free survival (PFS HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.37-0.60; I2 0%) with CAR-T cell therapy compared to SOC. Although there was a signal of potential overall survival (OS) improvement with CAR-T cell therapy, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.56 to 1.03; I2 29%). Mixed treatment comparisons showed significant EFS benefit with liso-cel (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.22-0.61) and axi-cel (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.29-0.61) compared to tisa-cel.

Discussion:

CAR-T cell therapy, as a second-line treatment, appears to be effective in achieving higher response rates and delaying the disease progression compared to SOC in R/R DLBCL.
Key words

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Pakistan

Full text: 1 Collection: 01-internacional Database: MEDLINE Language: En Journal: Front Oncol Year: 2024 Type: Article Affiliation country: Pakistan