Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
On- and off-label utilization of dalbavancin and oritavancin for Gram-positive infections.
Morrisette, Taylor; Miller, Matthew A; Montague, Brian T; Barber, Gerard R; McQueen, R Brett; Krsak, Martin.
Afiliación
  • Morrisette T; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Miller MA; Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Montague BT; Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Barber GR; Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • McQueen RB; Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
  • Krsak M; Department of Pharmacy-Infectious Diseases, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, CO, USA.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 74(8): 2405-2416, 2019 08 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31322694
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Long-acting lipoglycopeptides (laLGPs) are FDA approved only for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs). However, these antibiotics show promise for off-label use, reductions in hospital length of stay (LOS) and healthcare cost savings.

OBJECTIVES:

To assess the effectiveness, safety, impact on LOS and estimated cost savings from laLGP treatment for Gram-positive infections.

METHODS:

Retrospective cohort of adult patients who received at least one dose of laLGPs at the University of Colorado Health system. Descriptive statistics were utilized for analysis.

RESULTS:

Of 59 patients screened, 56 were included mean age 47 years, 59% male and 30% injection drug users/polysubstance abusers (dalbavancin, 71%; oritavancin, 25%; both, 4%). Most common indications for laLGP ABSSSIs (36%), osteomyelitis (27%) and endocarditis (9%). Most common isolated pathogens MSSA and MRSA (25% and 19%, respectively), Enterococcus faecalis (11%) and CoNS (11%). Previous antibiotics were administered for a median of 13 days (IQR = 7.0-24.5 days) and laLGPs for a median of one dose (IQR = 1-2 doses). Ten (18%) patients were lost to follow-up. Clinical failure was found in 7/47 (15%) cases with adequate follow-up. Mild adverse effects occurred in six (11%) patients. Projected reduction in hospital LOS and health-system costs were 514 days (9.18 days/person average) and $963456.72 ($17204.58/person average), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Prospective trials are needed to validate the use of these antibiotics for Gram-positive infections in practice, with the hope that they will reduce hospital LOS and the need for daily antibiotic infusions to provide alternative options for patients not qualifying for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas / Teicoplanina / Lipoglucopéptidos / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas / Teicoplanina / Lipoglucopéptidos / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Antimicrob Chemother Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos