Construct identification in the neuropsychological battery: What are we measuring?
Neuropsychology
; 37(4): 351-372, 2023 May.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-35737535
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
Major obstacles to data harmonization in neuropsychology include lack of consensus about what constructs and tests are most important and invariant across healthy and clinical populations. This study addressed these challenges using data from the National Neuropsychology Network (NNN).METHOD:
Data were obtained from 5,000 NNN participants and Pearson standardization samples. Analyses included variables from four instruments Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, 4th Edition (WAIS-IV); Wechsler Memory Scale, 4th Edition (WMS-IV); California Verbal Learning Test, 3rd Edition (CVLT3); and Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS). We used confirmatory factor analysis to evaluate models suggested by prior work and examined fit statistics and measurement invariance across samples. We examined relations of factor scores to demographic and clinical characteristics.RESULTS:
For each instrument, we identified four first-order and one second-order factor. Optimal models in patients generally paralleled the best-fitting models in the standardization samples, including task-specific factors. Analysis of the NNN data prompted specification of a Recognition-Familiarity factor on the WMS-IV and an Inhibition-Switching factor on the D-KEFS. Analyses showed strong to strict factorial invariance across samples with expected differences in factor means and variances. The Recognition-Familiarity factor correlated with age more strongly in NNN than in the standardization sample.CONCLUSIONS:
Factor models derived from healthy groups generally fit well in patients. NNN data helped identify novel Recognition-Familiarity and Inhibition-Switching factors that were also invariant across samples and may be clinically useful. The findings support efforts to identify evidence-based and optimally efficient measurements of neuropsychological constructs that are valid across groups. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Reconocimiento en Psicología
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
Límite:
Adult
/
Humans
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Neuropsychology
Asunto de la revista:
NEUROLOGIA
/
PSICOLOGIA
Año:
2023
Tipo del documento:
Article