Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Finding and evaluating randomised controlled trials in nursing conducted by Spanish research teams: A scoping review.
Medina-Aedo, Melixa; Torralba-Martinez, Elena; Segura-Carrillo, Cristian; Buitrago-García, Diana; Solà, Ivan; Pardo-Hernández, Héctor; Bonfill, Xavier.
Afiliación
  • Medina-Aedo M; Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Torralba-Martinez E; Department of Paediatrics, Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Preventive Medicine and Public Health at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Segura-Carrillo C; Departamento de Trabajo Social, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile.
  • Buitrago-García D; Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
  • Solà I; Programa de Epidemiología Clínica, Fundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud-FUCS, Bogota, Colombia.
  • Pardo-Hernández H; Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB SantPau), Barcelona, Spain.
  • Bonfill X; CIBER de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Health Info Libr J ; 39(4): 312-322, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36333980
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVES:

To identify and assess the main characteristics and the potential risk of bias of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in nursing conducted by Spanish research teams.

METHODS:

Scoping review of an electronic search in three major databases (date of search October 2021). For the eligible studies, both descriptive data, and data to assess the potential risk of bias, were collected and analysed.

RESULTS:

Of 3391 references retrieved, 199 were eligible. These RCTs were published in 122 journals, most of them in English (101, 82.1%) and were included in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) (107, 87.7%). Moreover, 32 (26.2%) of those included in the JCR were classified under nursing. Two thirds (81, 66.4%) of the journals followed the CONSORT guidelines. A total of 65 RCTs (33.7%) had a high overall risk of bias.

DISCUSSION:

Most of the identified RCTs were published in journals not specific to nursing and in English language. Also, shortcomings in RCT design and reporting were observed despite recommendations to adhere the CONSORT guidelines.

CONCLUSION:

Comprehensive identification of RCTs in nursing may require searching in journals other than nursing-related. RCTs from Spanish research teams are more likely to be published in international journals published in English. CONSORT should be strongly advised to encourage proper design and reporting of RCTs.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Informe de Investigación / Lenguaje Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Info Libr J Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Informe de Investigación / Lenguaje Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Info Libr J Asunto de la revista: INFORMATICA MEDICA / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: España