Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Baseline systolic blood pressure, hypertension history, and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning.
Cai, Ji-Ru; Zhang, Nan-Nan; Cui, Yu; Ning, Yue-Xin; Wu, Qiong; Zhang, Yi-Na; Chen, Hui-Sheng.
Afiliación
  • Cai JR; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Zhang NN; Department of Neurology, Postgraduate Training Base of Jinzhou Medical University in the General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Cui Y; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Ning YX; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Wu Q; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Zhang YN; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
  • Chen HS; Department of Neurology, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol ; 11(7): 1703-1714, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38831636
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

We performed a post hoc exploratory analysis of Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Acute Moderate Ischemic Stroke (RICAMIS) to determine whether hypertension history and baseline systolic blood pressure (SBP) affect the efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning (RIC).

METHODS:

Based on the full analysis set of RICAMIS, patients were divided into hypertension versus non-hypertension group, or <140 mmHg versus ≥140 mmHg group. Each group was further subdivided into RIC and control subgroups. The primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1 at 90 days. Efficacy of RIC was compared among patients with hypertension versus nonhypertension history and SBP of <140 mmHg versus ≥140 mmHg. Furthermore, the interaction effect of treatment with hypertension and SBP was assessed.

RESULTS:

Compared with control group, RIC produced a significantly higher proportion of patients with excellent functional outcome in the nonhypertension group (RIC vs. control 65.7% vs. 57.0%, OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.06-1.98; p = 0.02), but no significant difference was observed in the hypertension group (RIC vs. control 69.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.17). Similar results were observed in SBP ≥140 mmHg group (RIC vs. control 68.0% vs. 61.2%, p = 0.009) and SBP <140 mmHg group (RIC vs. control 65.6% vs. 64.7%, p = 0.77). No interaction effect of RIC on primary outcome was identified.

INTERPRETATION:

Hypertension and baseline SBP did not affect the neuroprotective effect of RIC, but they were associated with higher probability of excellent functional outcome in patients with acute moderate ischemic stroke who received RIC treatment.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Presión Sanguínea / Precondicionamiento Isquémico / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico / Hipertensión Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Presión Sanguínea / Precondicionamiento Isquémico / Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico / Hipertensión Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Clin Transl Neurol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China