Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
QUATTRO-II randomized trial: CAPOXIRI+bevacizumab vs. FOLFOXIRI+bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with mCRC.
Bando, Hideaki; Kotani, Daisuke; Satake, Hironaga; Hamaguchi, Tetsuya; Shiozawa, Manabu; Kotaka, Masahito; Masuishi, Toshiki; Yasui, Hisateru; Kagawa, Yoshinori; Komatsu, Yoshito; Oki, Eiji; Yamamoto, Yoshiyuki; Kawakami, Hisato; Misumi, Toshihiro; Taniguchi, Hiroya; Yamazaki, Kentaro; Muro, Kei; Yoshino, Takayuki; Kato, Takeshi; Tsuji, Akihito.
Afiliación
  • Bando H; Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Kotani D; Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Satake H; Department of Medical Oncology, Kochi Medical School/Kansai Medical University, Nankoku, Japan. Electronic address: takeh1977@gmail.com.
  • Hamaguchi T; Department of Gastroenterological Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan.
  • Shiozawa M; Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Kotaka M; Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, Sano Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Masuishi T; Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Yasui H; Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
  • Kagawa Y; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.
  • Komatsu Y; Department of Cancer Chemotherapy, Hokkaido University Hospital Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.
  • Oki E; Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
  • Yamamoto Y; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
  • Kawakami H; Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osakasayama, Japan.
  • Misumi T; Department of Data Science, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Taniguchi H; Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Yamazaki K; Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
  • Muro K; Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
  • Yoshino T; Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
  • Kato T; Department of Surgery, NHO Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan.
  • Tsuji A; Department of Medical Oncology, Kagawa University Hospital, Kagawa, Japan.
Med ; 2024 Jun 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38901425
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The QUATTRO-II trial examined the efficacy and safety of capecitabine+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (CAPOXIRI)+bevacizumab (BEV) vs. 5-fluorouracil+folinic acid+oxaliplatin+irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)+BEV in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS:

In this phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04097444; jRCTs041190072), patients were randomized (11) to FOLFOXIRI+BEV or CAPOXIRI+BEV. The induction treatment in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV/CAPOXIRI+BEV arms was continued for 8/6 cycles (maximum 12/8 cycles if feasible), and the maintenance treatment was 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin+BEV or capecitabine+BEV at the investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with the two arms deemed equivalent if the hazard ratio (HR) of the point estimate was 0.80 < HR < 1.25. Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), incidence of adverse events (AEs), and patient-reported outcomes.

FINDINGS:

Overall, 51 and 52 patients were randomized to FOLFOXIRI+BEV and CAPOXIRI+BEV, respectively. The study met its primary endpoint; PFS at median follow-up of 23.7 months was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.7-13.3) in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV arm vs. 10.9 months (95% CI, 9.3-14.3) in the CAPOXIRI+BEV arm (HR 1.114 [0.80 < HR < 1.25], p = 0.654). In the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms, the 2-year OS rate (95% CI) was 65.5% (49.5%-77.6%) vs. 74.3% (59.8%-84.2%), and the ORR (95% CI) was 76.5% (62.5%-87.2%) vs. 84.6% (71.9%-93.1%). Major (grade ≥3) AEs in the FOLFOXIRI+BEV vs. CAPOXIRI+BEV arms were neutropenia (68.6% vs. 40.4%), febrile neutropenia (9.8% vs. 11.5%), diarrhea (7.8% vs. 17.3%), and appetite loss (7.8% vs. 17.3%).

CONCLUSION:

CAPOXIRI+BEV was well tolerated with reduced hematological toxicity and efficacy comparable to those of FOLFOXIRI+BEV, providing a potentially convenient first-line treatment alternative to FOLFOXIRI+BEV in patients with mCRC.

FUNDING:

Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Med Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón