Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Experience with deceased donor kidney transplantation in 114 patients over age 60.
Moore, Phillip S; Farney, Alan C; Hartmann, Erica L; Rogers, Jeffrey; Doares, William; Gautreaux, Michael D; Iskandar, Samy S; Hairston, Gloria; Adams, Patricia L; Stratta, Robert J.
Afiliação
  • Moore PS; Department of General Surgery, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1095, USA.
Surgery ; 142(4): 514-23; discussion 523.e1-2, 2007 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17950343
BACKGROUND: In the recent past, advanced age was a contraindication to kidney transplantation (KT). The purpose of this study was to review retrospectively our single center experience in deceased donor (DD) KT with respect to recipient age. METHODS: From 10/1/01 to 9/1/06, we performed 356 adult DD KTs. Patients received antibody induction in combination with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and tapered steroids. RESULTS: A total of 114 (32%) patients were greater than 60 (including 25 >70 years), 186 (52%) were 40-59 years of age, and 56 (16%) were 19-39 years of age. Of the 114 older patients, 61 (54%) received KTs from expanded criteria DDs (ECD), more than the younger age groups (39% ECDs in patients 40-59 years versus 18% ECDs in patients 19-39 years, P < .0001). Mean waiting time (21 mo) was less for patients greater than 60 years compared with the other 2 groups combined (29 mo, P = .06). Patient survival was 91% in recipients greater than 60 years compared with 95% in those less than 60 years of age (P = NS) with a mean follow-up of 27 mo. Graft survival was similar for all 3 age groups (82% >60 years vs 83% in patients 40-59 years vs 87% in patients 19-39 years, P = NS). Initial and subsequent graft function, morbidity, and resource use were similar among groups. Patient survival [93% ECD vs 89% standard criteria DDs (SCD), P = NS) and graft survival (82% ECD vs 81% SCD, P = NS) rates were similar, whereas mean waiting times (18 mo ECD vs 25 mo SCD, P = .04) were less in patients greater than 60 years who received ECD KTs compared with patients greater than 60 years who received SCD KTs. CONCLUSIONS: Patients greater than 60 years account currently for one third of DD KTs performed at our center, and more than half receive kidneys from ECDs. By preferentially directing ECD kidneys to appropriately selected elderly patients, waiting times can be decreased and survival is similar compared with SCD KTs in the elderly. In addition, short-term outcomes can be achieved in patients greater than 60 years that are comparable with those in younger patients.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doadores de Tecidos / Transplante de Rim / Rejeição de Enxerto / Sobrevivência de Enxerto Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Surgery Ano de publicação: 2007 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos