Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
High-risk retrieval of adherent and chronically implanted IVC filters: techniques for removal and management of thrombotic complications.
Kuo, William T; Tong, Ricky T; Hwang, Gloria L; Louie, John D; Lebowitz, Edward A; Sze, Daniel Y; Hofmann, Lawrence V.
Afiliação
  • Kuo WT; Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Dr, H-3630, Stanford, CA 94305-5642, USA. wkuo@stanford.edu
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 20(12): 1548-56, 2009 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19864160
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of aggressive techniques for retrieving adherent and chronically implanted inferior vena cava (IVC) filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective review was performed on all patients who underwent attempted filter retrieval from October 2007 through October 2008. Patients were included in the study if they had an adherent filter, refractory to standard retrieval techniques, and underwent high-risk retrieval after procedural risks were deemed lower than risks of long-term filter implantation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were diagnosed with an adherent filter, 13 (93%) of whom were candidates for high-risk retrieval. These patients included seven men and six women (mean age, 40 years; age range, 18-71 years). Nine of the 13 patients (69%) were referred from an outside hospital. Filter retrieval was performed for the following indications: to avoid the risk of long-term thrombotic complications in a young patient (n= 6), to treat symptomatic filter-related IVC stenosis (n= 5), to treat symptomatic filter penetration (n= 1), and to avoid the need for lifelong anticoagulation (n= 1). There were eight Günther-Tulip filters (mean dwell time, 356 days; range 53-1,181 days), two Optease filters (mean dwell time, 62 days; range, 52-72 days), one G2 filter (dwell time, 420 days), and two Recovery filters (mean dwell time, 1,630 days; range, 1,429-1,830 days). Three IVC occlusions necessitated recanalization to facilitate retrieval. High-risk retrieval with use of various techniques with aggressive force was successful in all 13 patients (100%). Partial caval thrombosis occurred in the first four patients (31%) but did not occur after procedural modifications were implemented. There were no complications at clinical follow-up (mean, 221 days; range, 84-452 days). CONCLUSIONS: Alternative techniques can be used to retrieve adherent IVC filters implanted for up to 3-5 years. Although caval thrombosis was an observed complication, protocol modifications appeared to reduce this risk.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Cava Inferior / Falha de Prótese / Cateterismo Periférico / Filtros de Veia Cava / Trombose Venosa / Remoção de Dispositivo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Veia Cava Inferior / Falha de Prótese / Cateterismo Periférico / Filtros de Veia Cava / Trombose Venosa / Remoção de Dispositivo Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Vasc Interv Radiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2009 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos