Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy.
Smith, Andrew Dennis; Shah, Shetal N; Rini, Brian I; Lieber, Michael L; Remer, Erick M.
Afiliação
  • Smith AD; Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. smithmdphd@yahoo.com
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 194(6): 1470-8, 2010 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20489085
OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate response assessment and predict clinical outcome in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) receiving antiangiogenic targeted therapy. Target lesions were assessed on routine contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) images obtained during the portal venous phase using new response criteria. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Standard CECT examinations of patients with metastatic clear cell RCC on first-line sunitinib or sorafenib therapy (n = 84) were retrospectively evaluated using Mass, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) Criteria; Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST); Size and Attenuation CT (SACT) Criteria; and modified Choi Criteria. The objective response to therapy was compared with clinical outcomes including time to progression (TTP) and disease-specific survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival functions. RESULTS: A favorable response according to MASS Criteria had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100% in identifying patients with a good clinical outcome (i.e., progression-free survival of > 250 days) versus 17% and 100%, respectively, for RECIST partial response. The objective categories of response used by MASS Criteria-favorable response, indeterminate response, and unfavorable response-differed significantly from one another with respect to TTP (p < 0.0001, log-rank test) and disease-specific survival (p < 0.0001, log-rank test). CONCLUSION: Assessment of metastatic RCC target lesions on CECT for changes in morphology, attenuation, size, and structure by MASS Criteria is more accurate than response assessment by SACT Criteria, RECIST, or modified Choi Criteria. Furthermore, the use of MASS Criteria for imaging response assessment showed high interobserver agreement and may predict disease outcome in patients with metastatic RCC on targeted therapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridinas / Pirróis / Benzenossulfonatos / Carcinoma de Células Renais / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Inibidores da Angiogênese / Indóis / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridinas / Pirróis / Benzenossulfonatos / Carcinoma de Células Renais / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X / Inibidores da Angiogênese / Indóis / Neoplasias Renais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Ano de publicação: 2010 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos