Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Neutropenia management and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor use in patients with solid tumours receiving myelotoxic chemotherapy--findings from clinical practice.
Krzemieniecki, K; Sevelda, P; Erdkamp, F; Smakal, M; Schwenkglenks, M; Puertas, J; Trojan, A; Szabo, Z; Bendall, K; Maenpaa, J.
Afiliação
  • Krzemieniecki K; Oncology Department, University Hospital, Sniadeckich 10, Krakow, 31-531, Poland, krzemieniecki@plusnet.pl.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(3): 667-77, 2014 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24154740
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Clinical practice adherence to current guidelines that recommend primary prophylaxis (PP) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) for patients at high (≥20 %) overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) was evaluated.

METHODS:

Adult patients with breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), or ovarian cancer were enrolled if myelotoxic chemotherapy was planned, and they had an investigator-assessed overall FN risk ≥20 %. The primary outcome was FN incidence.

RESULTS:

In total, 1,347 patients were analysed (breast cancer, n = 829; NSCLC, n = 224; SCLC, n = 137; ovarian cancer, n = 157). Patients with breast cancer exhibited fewer individual FN risk factors than patients with other cancers and were far more likely to have received a high-FN-risk chemotherapy regimen. However, a substantial proportion of all patients (45-80 % across tumour types) did not receive G-CSF PP in alignment with investigator risk assessment and guideline recommendations. FN occurred in 127 patients overall (9 %, 95% confidence interval (CI) 8-11 %), and incidence was higher in SCLC (15 %) than other tumour types (8 % in ovarian and NSCLC, 9 % in breast cancer). A post hoc analysis of G-CSF use indicated that G-CSF prophylaxis was not given within the recommended timeframe after chemotherapy (within 1-3 days) or was not continued across all cycles in 39 % of patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

FN risk assessment was predominantly based on clinical judgement and individual risk factors, and guidelines regarding G-CSF PP for patients at high FN risk were not consistently followed. Improved education of physicians may enable more fully informed neutropenia management in patients with solid tumours.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neutropenia Febril / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Ovarianas / Neoplasias da Mama / Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos / Neutropenia Febril / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Support Care Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / SERVICOS DE SAUDE Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article