Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combining Multiple Types of Motor Rehabilitation Enhances Skilled Forelimb Use Following Experimental Traumatic Brain Injury in Rats.
Adkins, DeAnna L; Ferguson, Lindsay; Lance, Steven; Pevtsov, Aleksandr; McDonough, Kevin; Stamschror, Justin; Jones, Theresa A; Kozlowski, Dorothy A.
Afiliação
  • Adkins DL; Department of Neuroscience, Medical University of South Carolina Charleston, SC, USA.
  • Ferguson L; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Lance S; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Pevtsov A; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • McDonough K; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Stamschror J; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Jones TA; Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
  • Kozlowski DA; Department of Biological Sciences, DePaul University, Chicago, IL, USA dkozlows@depaul.edu.
Neurorehabil Neural Repair ; 29(10): 989-1000, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25761884
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Neuroplasticity and neurorehabilitation have been extensively studied in animal models of stroke to guide clinical rehabilitation of stroke patients. Similar studies focused on traumatic brain injury (TBI) are lacking.

OBJECTIVE:

The current study was designed to examine the effects of individual and combined rehabilitative approaches, previously shown to be beneficial following stroke, in an animal model of moderate/severe TBI, the controlled cortical impact (CCI).

METHODS:

Rats received a unilateral CCI, followed by reach training, voluntary exercise, or unimpaired forelimb constraint, alone or in combination. Forelimb function was assessed at different time points post-CCI by tests of skilled reaching, motor coordination, and asymmetrical limb use.

RESULTS:

Following CCI, skilled reaching and motor coordination were significantly enhanced by combinations of rehabilitation strategies, not by individual approaches. The return of symmetrical limb use benefited from forelimb constraint alone. None of the rehabilitation strategies affected the size of injury, suggesting that enhanced behavioral function was not a result of neuroprotection.

CONCLUSIONS:

The current study has provided evidence that individual rehabilitation strategies shown to be beneficial in animal models of stroke are not similarly sufficient to enhance behavioral outcome in a model of TBI. Motor rehabilitation strategies for TBI patients may need to be more intense and varied. Future basic science studies exploring the underlying mechanisms of combined rehabilitation approaches in TBI as well as clinical studies comparing rehabilitation approaches for stroke versus TBI would prove fruitful.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Encefálicas / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Transtornos das Habilidades Motoras / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Extremidade Superior Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Lesões Encefálicas / Modalidades de Fisioterapia / Transtornos das Habilidades Motoras / Recuperação de Função Fisiológica / Extremidade Superior Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Assunto da revista: NEUROLOGIA / REABILITACAO Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos