Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Implementing a structured education program for children with diabetes: lessons learnt from an integrated process evaluation.
Sawtell, Mary; Jamieson, Liz; Wiggins, Meg; Smith, Felicity; Ingold, Anne; Hargreaves, Katrina; Khatwa, Meena; Brooks, Lucy; Thompson, Rebecca; Christie, Deborah.
Afiliação
  • Sawtell M; Social Science Research Unit , UCL Institute of Education , London , UK.
  • Jamieson L; Department of Practice and Policy , UCL School of Pharmacy , London , UK.
  • Wiggins M; Social Science Research Unit , Institute of Education , London , UK.
  • Smith F; Department of Practice and Policy , UCL School of Pharmacy , London , UK.
  • Ingold A; Social Science Research Unit , Institute of Education , London , UK.
  • Hargreaves K; Social Science Research Unit , Institute of Education , London , UK.
  • Khatwa M; Social Science Research Unit , Institute of Education , London , UK.
  • Brooks L; Medical Statistics Department , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK.
  • Thompson R; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
  • Christie D; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London , UK.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care ; 3(1): e000065, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25969740
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is recognition of an urgent need for clinic-based interventions for young people with type 1 diabetes mellitus that improve glycemic control and quality of life. The Child and Adolescent Structured Competencies Approach to Diabetes Education (CASCADE) is a structured educational group program, using psychological techniques, delivered primarily by diabetes nurses. Composed of four modules, it is designed for children with poor diabetic control and their parents. A mixed methods process evaluation, embedded within a cluster randomized control trial, aimed to assess the feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and perceived impact of CASCADE.

METHODS:

28 pediatric diabetes clinics across England participated and 362 children aged 8-16 years, with type 1 diabetes and a mean glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 8.5 or above, took part. The process evaluation used a wide range of research methods.

RESULTS:

Of the 180 families in the intervention group, only 55 (30%) received the full program with 53% attending at least one module. Only 68% of possible groups were run. Staff found organizing the groups burdensome in terms of arranging suitable dates/times and satisfactory group composition. Some staff also reported difficulties in mastering the psychological techniques. Uptake, by families, was influenced by the number of groups run and by school, work and other commitments. Attendees described improved family relationships; knowledge and understanding; confidence; motivation to manage the disease. The results of the trial showed that the intervention did not significantly improve HbA1c at 12 or 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

Clinic-based structured group education delivered by staff using psychological techniques had perceived benefits for parents and young people. Staff and families considered it a valuable intervention, yet uptake was poor and the burden on staff was high. Recommendations are made to inform issues related to organization, design, and delivery in order to potentially enhance the impact of CASCADE and future programs. CURRENT CONTROLLED TRIALS ISRCTN52537669.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies / Guideline Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido