Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk factor burden and control at the time of admission in patients with acute myocardial infarction: Results from the NCDR.
Paixao, Andre R M; Enriquez, Jonathan R; Wang, Tracy Y; Li, Shuang; Berry, Jarett D; Khera, Amit; Das, Sandeep R; de Lemos, James A; Kontos, Michael C.
Afiliação
  • Paixao AR; Emory University, Atlanta, GA. Electronic address: andrepaixaobh@gmail.com.
  • Enriquez JR; University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO.
  • Wang TY; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Li S; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC.
  • Berry JD; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Khera A; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Das SR; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • de Lemos JA; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX.
  • Kontos MC; Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA.
Am Heart J ; 170(1): 173-9, 179.e1, 2015 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26093879
BACKGROUND: Understanding risk factor burden and control as well as perceived risk prior to acute myocardial infarction (MI) presentation may identify gaps in contemporary systems of care. METHODS: Patients presenting with MI in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry--Get With the Guidelines between January 2007 and November 2013 (N = 443,117) were stratified into 5 mutually exclusive risk categories: Framingham Risk Score (FRS) <10% 74,990 (16.9%), FRS 10% to 20% 90,429 (20.4%), FRS >20% 25,701 (5.8%), diabetes without cardiovascular disease (CVD) 67,779 (15.3%), and prior CVD 184,218 (41.6%). Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) goals and statin eligibility were determined based on the Third Adult Treatment Panel. RESULTS: At presentation, 66.3% met the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol goal, 66.8% met the non-HDL-C goal, 63.7% were nonsmokers, and 65.1% of patients with prior CVD were on aspirin. Only 36.1% of patients met all assessed risk factor control metrics. Overall statin eligibility prior to MI was 60.8%, and 61.1% of statin-eligible patients reported statin use. CONCLUSION: Risk factor control prior to MI was suboptimal, with the majority of individuals failing to meet at least 1 risk factor control metric. More effective system-based interventions are needed to promote adherence to prevention targets.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumar / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Diabetes Mellitus / Dislipidemias / Hospitalização / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fumar / Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto / Fidelidade a Diretrizes / Diabetes Mellitus / Dislipidemias / Hospitalização / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am Heart J Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article