Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Poststroke Rehabilitation and Restorative Care Utilization: A Comparison Between VA Community Living Centers and VA-contracted Community Nursing Homes.
Jia, Huanguang; Pei, Qinglin; Sullivan, Charles T; Cowper Ripley, Diane C; Wu, Samuel S; Bates, Barbara E; Vogel, W Bruce; Bidelspach, Douglas E; Wang, Xinping; Hoffman, Nannette.
Afiliação
  • Jia H; *Center of Innovation on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System (NF/SGVHS), Gainesville, FL †Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Albany VA Medical Center, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY ‡Department of Veterans Affairs, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service (PM&R), Washington, DC §Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL.
Med Care ; 54(3): 235-42, 2016 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26807537
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Effective poststroke rehabilitation care can speed patient recovery and minimize patient functional disabilities. Veterans affairs (VA) community living centers (CLCs) and VA-contracted community nursing homes (CNHs) are the 2 major sources of institutional long-term care for Veterans with stroke receiving care under VA auspices.

OBJECTIVES:

This study compares rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care among Veterans residing in VA CLCs versus those Veterans in VA-contracted CNHs. RESEARCH

DESIGN:

Retrospective observational.

SUBJECTS:

All Veterans diagnosed with stroke, newly admitted to the CLCs or CNHs during the study period who completed at least 2 Minimum Data Set assessments postadmission.

MEASURES:

The outcomes were numbers of days for rehabilitation therapy and restorative nursing care received by the Veterans during their stays in CLCs or CNHs as documented in the Minimum Data Set databases.

RESULTS:

For rehabilitation therapy, the CLC Veterans had lower user rates (75.2% vs. 76.4%, P=0.078) and fewer observed therapy days (4.9 vs. 6.4, P<0.001) than CNH Veterans. However, the CLC Veterans had higher adjusted odds for therapy (odds ratio=1.16, P=0.033), although they had fewer average therapy days (coefficient=-1.53±0.11, P<0.001). For restorative nursing care, CLC Veterans had higher user rates (33.5% vs. 30.6%, P<0.001), more observed average care days (9.4 vs. 5.9, P<0.001), higher adjusted odds (odds ratio=2.28, P<0.001), and more adjusted days for restorative nursing care (coefficient=5.48±0.37, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Compared with their counterparts at VA-contracted CNHs, Veterans at VA CLCs had fewer average rehabilitation therapy days (both unadjusted and adjusted), but they were significantly more likely to receive restorative nursing care both before and after risk adjustment.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros de Reabilitação / United States Department of Veterans Affairs / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Casas de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Centros de Reabilitação / United States Department of Veterans Affairs / Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Casas de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Med Care Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article