Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative evaluation of antibody detection tests to facilitate the diagnosis of multibacillary leprosy.
Duthie, Malcolm S; Orcullo, Florenda M; Abbelana, Junie; Maghanoy, Armi; Balagon, Marivic F.
Afiliação
  • Duthie MS; Infectious Disease Research Institute, 1616 Eastlake Ave E, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA. mduthie@idri.org.
  • Orcullo FM; Leonard Wood Memorial Center for Leprosy Research, Cebu, Philippines.
  • Abbelana J; Leonard Wood Memorial Center for Leprosy Research, Cebu, Philippines.
  • Maghanoy A; Leonard Wood Memorial Center for Leprosy Research, Cebu, Philippines.
  • Balagon MF; Leonard Wood Memorial Center for Leprosy Research, Cebu, Philippines.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol ; 100(7): 3267-75, 2016 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26820649
ABSTRACT
Despite control efforts, leprosy persists as a significant health concern in many regions. Diagnosis is achieved by a combination of clinical, histopathological, and bacteriological examinations, each of which presents a barrier to expeditious diagnosis, particularly by non-experts. Immunological investigations in research laboratories have clearly indicated that antibody detection tests could aid the diagnosis of leprosy. In this study, we detected circulating antibodies with two rapid diagnostic tests (RDT) involving immunochromatographic lateral flow platforms and one rapid ELISA system. Leprosy patients were identified with a high degree of sensitivity in each assay (over 80% in all; over 90% among cases with bacterial indices >1+), although critical differences were observed in specificity. While the specificity of CTK OnSite Leprosy Ab Rapid Test and InBios Leprosy Detect™ fast ELISA were high (96.4 and 93.7% in the general population, respectively), there was a marked reduction in OrangeLife NDO-LID® RDT (only 25.0%). As anticipated, seropositivity rates were marginally higher in contacts of leprosy patients than in endemic controls. Although we observed a slight drop in test band intensity when blood, rather than serum, was used to develop OnSite Leprosy Ab Rapid Tests, the sensitivity and specificity of these tests was unaffected. When we contrasted test performance with clinical and bacteriological information, we found that RDT and ELISA results positively correlated with the bacteriological index. These data indicate that these assays could be a ready replacement of invasive, insensitive, and time consuming skin slit smear procedures that additionally require expert microscopic examinations. We propose that, due to their speed and point of care applicability, the RDT could be used as an initial entry point to the diagnostic protocols, with confirmation of results attained in a highly quantitative manner following serum transfer to a reference laboratory.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática / Cromatografia de Afinidade / Hanseníase Multibacilar / Anticorpos Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ensaio de Imunoadsorção Enzimática / Cromatografia de Afinidade / Hanseníase Multibacilar / Anticorpos Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos