Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Blood pressure-lowering effects of nifedipine/candesartan combinations in high-risk individuals: subgroup analysis of the DISTINCT randomised trial.
Mancia, G; Cha, G; Gil-Extremera, B; Harvey, P; Lewin, A J; Villa, G; Kjeldsen, S E.
Afiliação
  • Mancia G; Unit and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
  • Cha G; KRK Medical Research Institute, Dallas, TX, USA.
  • Gil-Extremera B; Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
  • Harvey P; Formerly in The Crouch Oak Family Practice, Addlestone, UK.
  • Lewin AJ; National Research Institute, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Villa G; Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri-IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
  • Kjeldsen SE; Oslo University Hospital Ullevaal, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
J Hum Hypertens ; 31(3): 178-188, 2017 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27511476
ABSTRACT
The DISTINCT study (reDefining Intervention with Studies Testing Innovative Nifedipine GITS-Candesartan Therapy) investigated the efficacy and safety of nifedipine GITS/candesartan cilexetil combinations vs respective monotherapies and placebo in patients with hypertension. This descriptive sub-analysis examined blood pressure (BP)-lowering effects in high-risk participants, including those with renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate<90 ml min-1, n=422), type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=202), hypercholesterolaemia (n=206) and cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (n=971), as well as the impact of gender, age and body mass index (BMI). Participants with grade I/II hypertension were randomised to treatment with nifedipine GITS (N) 20, 30, 60 mg and/or candesartan cilexetil (C) 4, 8, 16, 32 mg or placebo for 8 weeks. Mean systolic BP and diastolic BP reductions after treatment in high-risk participants were greater, overall, with N/C combinations vs respective monotherapies or placebo, with indicators of a dose-response effect. Highest rates of BP control (ESH/ESC 2013 guideline criteria) were also achieved with highest doses of N/C combinations in each high-risk subgroup. The benefits of combination therapy vs monotherapy were additionally observed in patient subgroups categorised by gender, age or BMI. All high-risk participants reported fewer vasodilatory adverse events in the pooled N/C combination therapy than the N monotherapy group. In conclusion, consistent with the DISTINCT main study outcomes, high-risk participants showed greater reductions in BP and higher control rates with N/C combinations compared with respective monotherapies and lesser vasodilatory side-effects compared with N monotherapy.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tetrazóis / Benzimidazóis / Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio / Nifedipino / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Hypertens Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Tetrazóis / Benzimidazóis / Bloqueadores dos Canais de Cálcio / Nifedipino / Hipertensão / Anti-Hipertensivos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Hum Hypertens Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália