Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantification of Urine Elimination Behaviors in Cats with a Video Recording System.
R Dulaney, D; Hopfensperger, M; Malinowski, R; Hauptman, J; Kruger, J M.
Afiliação
  • R Dulaney D; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Hopfensperger M; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Malinowski R; Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Hauptman J; Center for Academic Technology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
  • Kruger JM; Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
J Vet Intern Med ; 31(2): 486-491, 2017 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28256091
BACKGROUND: Urinary disorders in cats often require subjective caregiver quantification of clinical signs to establish a diagnosis and monitor therapeutic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate use of a video recording system (VRS) to better assess and quantify urination behaviors in cats. ANIMALS: Eleven healthy cats and 8 cats with disorders potentially associated with abnormal urination patterns. METHODS: Prospective study design. Litter box urination behaviors were quantified with a VRS for 14 days and compared to daily caregiver observations. Video recordings were analyzed by a behavior analysis software program. RESULTS: The mean number of urinations per day detected by VRS (2.5 ± 0.7) was significantly higher compared with caregiver observations (0.6 ± 0.6; P < .0001). Five cats were never observed in the litter box by their caregivers. The mean number of urinations per day detected by VRS was significantly higher for abnormal cats (2.9 ± 0.7) compared with healthy cats (2.1 ± 0.7; P = .02); there were no apparent differences in frequency between these groups reported by caregivers (0.7 ± 1.0 and 0.5 ± 1.0, respectively). There were no differences in mean urination time between healthy and abnormal cats as determined by VRS or caregivers. Mean cover-up time determined by VRS was significantly longer in healthy cats (22.7 ± 12.9 seconds/urination) compared with abnormal cats (8.7 ± 12.9 seconds/urination; P = .03); differences in cover-up time were not detected by caregivers. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Caregivers commonly underestimate urination frequency in cats when compared to video-based observations. Video recording appears to facilitate objective assessment of urination behaviors and could be of value in future clinical studies of urinary disorders in cats.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Micção / Doenças do Gato / Comportamento Excretor Animal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Micção / Doenças do Gato / Comportamento Excretor Animal Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Vet Intern Med Assunto da revista: MEDICINA INTERNA / MEDICINA VETERINARIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article