Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Proposed Set of Metrics to Reduce Patient Safety Risk From Within the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory.
Banks, Peter; Brown, Richard; Laslowski, Alex; Daniels, Yvonne; Branton, Phil; Carpenter, John; Zarbo, Richard; Forsyth, Ramses; Liu, Yan-Hui; Kohl, Shane; Diebold, Joachim; Masuda, Shinobu; Plummer, Tim; Dennis, Eslie.
Afiliação
  • Banks P; Medical Affairs, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ.
  • Brown R; Laboratory Services, Memorial Hermann Southeast Hospital, Houston, TX.
  • Laslowski A; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Daniels Y; Department of Pathology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC.
  • Branton P; Biorepositories and Biospecimens Research Branch, Cancer Diagnosis Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
  • Carpenter J; Division of Pathology, Puget Sound Gastroenterology Medical Center, Lynnwood, WA.
  • Zarbo R; Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI.
  • Forsyth R; Department of Pathology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Liu YH; Department of Pathology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science Guangdong Province, China.
  • Kohl S; Anatomic & Clinical Pathology, Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc, Omaha, NE.
  • Diebold J; Leiter Departement Institute, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland.
  • Masuda S; Department of Pathology, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Plummer T; Operations Division, Mayo Clinic, Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
  • Dennis E; Medical Affairs, Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ.
Lab Med ; 48(2): 195-201, 2017 May 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340232
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anatomic pathology laboratory workflow consists of 3 major specimen handling processes. Among the workflow are preanalytic, analytic, and postanalytic phases that contain multistep subprocesses with great impact on patient care. A worldwide representation of experts came together to create a system of metrics, as a basis for laboratories worldwide, to help them evaluate and improve specimen handling to reduce patient safety risk.

METHOD:

Members of the Initiative for Anatomic Pathology Laboratory Patient Safety (IAPLPS) pooled their extensive expertise to generate a list of metrics highlighting processes with high and low risk for adverse patient outcomes.

RESULTS:

Our group developed a universal, comprehensive list of 47 metrics for patient specimen handling in the anatomic pathology laboratory. Steps within the specimen workflow sequence are categorized as high or low risk. In general, steps associated with the potential for specimen misidentification correspond to the high-risk grouping and merit greater focus within quality management systems. Primarily workflow measures related to operational efficiency can be considered low risk.

CONCLUSION:

Our group intends to advance the widespread use of these metrics in anatomic pathology laboratories to reduce patient safety risk and improve patient care with development of best practices and interlaboratory error reporting programs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patologia Clínica / Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Azerbaidjão

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Patologia Clínica / Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Laboratórios Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Lab Med Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Azerbaidjão