Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Preoperative Prediction of Node-Negative Disease After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Presenting with Node-Negative or Node-Positive Breast Cancer.
Murphy, Brittany L; L Hoskin, Tanya; Heins, Courtney Day N; Habermann, Elizabeth B; Boughey, Judy C.
Afiliação
  • Murphy BL; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • L Hoskin T; The Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Heins CDN; Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Habermann EB; Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
  • Boughey JC; Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 24(9): 2518-2525, 2017 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28484921
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Axillary node status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) influences the axillary surgical staging procedure as well as recommendations regarding reconstruction and radiation.

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to construct a clinical preoperative prediction model to identify the likelihood of patients being node negative after NAC.

METHODS:

Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from January 2010 to December 2012, we identified cT1-T4c, N0-N3 breast cancer patients treated with NAC. The effects of patient and tumor factors on pathologic node status were assessed by multivariable logistic regression separately for clinically node negative (cN0) and clinically node positive (cN+) disease, and two models were constructed. Model performance was validated in a cohort of NAC patients treated at our institution (January 2013-July 2016), and model discrimination was assessed by estimating the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS:

Of 16,153 NCDB patients, 6659 (41%) were cN0 and 9494 (59%) were cN+. Factors associated with pathologic nodal status and included in the models were patient age, tumor grade, biologic subtype, histology, clinical tumor category, and, in cN+ patients only, clinical nodal category. The validation dataset included 194 cN0 and 180 cN+ patients. The cN0 model demonstrated good discrimination, with an AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.74) in the NCDB and 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.85) in the external validation, while the cN+ patient model AUC was 0.71 (95% CI 0.70-0.72) in the NCDB and 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.82) in the external validation.

CONCLUSIONS:

We constructed two models that showed good discrimination for predicting ypN0 status following NAC in cN0 and cN+ patients. These clinically useful models can guide surgical planning after NAC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Modelos Logísticos / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Modelos Logísticos / Linfonodos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos