Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biologic treatment eligibility for real-world patients with severe asthma: The IDEAL study.
Albers, Frank C; Müllerová, Hana; Gunsoy, Necdet B; Shin, Ji-Yeon; Nelsen, Linda M; Bradford, Eric S; Cockle, Sarah M; Suruki, Robert Y.
Afiliação
  • Albers FC; a Respiratory Medical Franchise, GSK , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.
  • Müllerová H; b Real World Evidence, GSK , Stockley Park, Uxbridge , Middlesex , UK.
  • Gunsoy NB; c Clinical Statistics, GSK , Stockley Park, Uxbridge , Middlesex , UK.
  • Shin JY; d GSK , Seoul , South Korea.
  • Nelsen LM; e Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK , Collegeville , PA , USA.
  • Bradford ES; a Respiratory Medical Franchise, GSK , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.
  • Cockle SM; f Value Evidence and Outcomes, GSK House , Brentford , Middlesex , UK.
  • Suruki RY; g Worldwide Epidemiology, GSK , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.
J Asthma ; 55(2): 152-160, 2018 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28622052
OBJECTIVES: Severe asthma comprises several distinct phenotypes. Consequently, patients with severe asthma can be eligible for more than one biologic treatment targeting Th2 inflammation, such as anti-interleukin (IL)-5 and anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) E. The objective of this study was to describe treatment eligibility and overlap in treatment eligibility for mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), omalizumab (anti-IgE) and reslizumab (anti-IL-5) in patients with severe asthma, who were recruited from clinical practice. METHODS: This cross-sectional, single-visit, observational study in six countries enrolled patients with severe asthma (defined by American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines). Assessable patients were analysed as a total cohort and a sub-cohort, who were not currently receiving omalizumab. Treatment eligibility was defined according to the local prescribing information or protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients currently receiving omalizumab were automatically categorised as omalizumab-eligible. RESULTS: The total cohort comprised 670 patients who met the analysis criteria, of whom 20% were eligible for mepolizumab, 31-41% were eligible for omalizumab (depending on eligibility criteria used), and 5% were eligible for reslizumab. In patients not currently receiving omalizumab (n = 502), proportions eligible for each biologic were similar (mepolizumab: 20%, reslizumab 6%) or lower (omalizumab 7-21%) than those for the total cohort. Overlap in treatment eligibility varied; in mepolizumab-eligible patients not currently receiving omalizumab (n = 101), 27-37% were omalizumab-eligible and 18% were reslizumab-eligible. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment eligibility for mepolizumab and omalizumab was higher than that for reslizumab. Although there was some overlap in treatment eligibility, the patient groups eligible for treatment with anti-IL-5 or anti-IgE therapies were often distinct, emphasising the different phenotypes and endotypes in severe asthma.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Antiasmáticos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Asthma Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos