Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Factors Influencing IACUC Decision Making: Who Leads the Discussions?
Silverman, Jerald; Lidz, Charles W; Clayfield, Jonathan; Murray, Alexandra; Simon, Lorna J; Maranda, Louise.
Afiliação
  • Silverman J; 1 UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Lidz CW; 1 UMass Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA.
  • Clayfield J; 2 UMass Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA.
  • Murray A; 2 UMass Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA.
  • Simon LJ; 2 UMass Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA.
  • Maranda L; 2 UMass Medical School, Shrewsbury, MA, USA.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics ; 12(4): 209-216, 2017 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28660807
ABSTRACT
Decisions about the appropriate use of animals in research are largely made by Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees (IACUCs). Several commentators claim that scientists exert excessive influence on IACUC decisions. We studied 87 protocol reviews from 10 IACUCs to assess whether any group of participants appeared to dominate the protocol discussions. Audio recordings of the meetings were coded to capture the topics of the discussions. We found that animal research scientists made the largest total number of topic mentions while community members made the fewest. On a per person basis, chairpersons and attending veterinarians made the most mentions. Scientists presented the largest number of protocols, and the subsequent discussions tended to contain the same topics mentioned in the presentations. The large number of protocols presented by scientists and their total number of comments made during protocol discussions suggest that scientists may significantly influence IACUC decision making.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bem-Estar do Animal / Revisão Ética / Tomada de Decisões / Experimentação Animal / Comitês de Cuidado Animal / Participação dos Interessados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bem-Estar do Animal / Revisão Ética / Tomada de Decisões / Experimentação Animal / Comitês de Cuidado Animal / Participação dos Interessados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos