Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Human Exposure to Legacy and Emerging Halogenated Flame Retardants via Inhalation and Dust Ingestion in a Norwegian Cohort.
Tay, Joo Hui; Sellström, Ulla; Papadopoulou, Eleni; Padilla-Sánchez, Juan Antonio; Haug, Line Småstuen; de Wit, Cynthia A.
Afiliação
  • Tay JH; Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University , SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Sellström U; Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University , SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Papadopoulou E; Department of Environmental Exposure and Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Lovisenberggata 8, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
  • Padilla-Sánchez JA; Department of Environmental Exposure and Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Lovisenberggata 8, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
  • Haug LS; Department of Environmental Exposure and Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) , Lovisenberggata 8, N-0403 Oslo, Norway.
  • de Wit CA; Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES), Stockholm University , SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden.
Environ Sci Technol ; 51(14): 8176-8184, 2017 Jul 18.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661659
In this study, we estimated human exposure to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), hexabromocyclododecanes (HBCDDs), and several emerging flame retardants (EFRs) via inhalation and dust ingestion. Sixty indoor stationary air samples, 13 personal air samples, and 60 settled dust samples were collected from a Norwegian cohort during winter 2013. PBDEs showed the highest median concentration in dust (1200 ng/g), followed by EFRs (730 ng/g) and HBCDDs (190 ng/g). The PBDE concentrations in dust were mainly driven by BDE-209 and those of EFRs by bis(2-ethylhexyl) tetrabromophthalate. EFRs predominated in stationary air samples, with 2-ethylhexyl 2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoate and 4-(1,2-dibromoethyl)-1,2-dibromocyclohexane having the highest median concentrations (150 and 25 pg/m3 (sum of α- and ß-isomers), respectively). Different profiles and concentrations were observed in personal air samples compared to the corresponding stationary air samples. In relation to inhalation exposure, dust ingestion appears to be the major exposure pathway to FRs (median total exposure 230 pg/kg bw/d, accounting for more than 65% of the total exposure) for the Norwegian cohort. The calculated exposure due to air inhalation was substantially lower when the stationary air concentrations were used rather than personal air concentrations (43 pg/kg bw/d versus 130 pg/kg bw/d). This suggests that other exposure situations (such as outdoors or in offices) contributed significantly to the overall personal exposure, which cannot be included by using only a stationary air sampling technique. The median and 95th percentile exposures for all target FRs did not exceed the reference dose.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Exposição por Inalação / Éteres Difenil Halogenados / Retardadores de Chama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Ambiental / Exposição por Inalação / Éteres Difenil Halogenados / Retardadores de Chama Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia