Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
In Vitro Effect of Lysozyme on Albumin Deposition to Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials.
Babaei Omali, Negar; Subbaraman, Lakshman N; Heynen, Miriam; Fadli, Zohra; Coles-Brennan, Chantal; Jones, Lyndon W.
Afiliação
  • Babaei Omali N; 1Centre for Contact Lens Research (CCLR), School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 2Johnson and Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Jacksonville, Florida *nbabaeio@uwaterloo.ca.
Optom Vis Sci ; 94(11): 1047-1051, 2017 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29040199
ABSTRACT

SIGNIFICANCE:

Albumin deposition on contact lenses could be detrimental to contact lens (CL) wear because this may increase the risk of bacterial binding and reduce comfort. Lysozyme deposition on selected lens materials would reduce albumin deposition on lenses.

PURPOSE:

This study aims to determine if lysozyme deposition on CLs could act as a barrier against subsequent albumin adsorption, using an in vitro model.

METHODS:

Six hydrogel CL materials (etafilcon A, polymacon, nelfilcon A, omafilcon A, ocufilcon B, and nesofilcon A) were evaluated. Four CLs of each type were soaked in lysozyme solution for 16 hours at 37°C. Lysozyme-coated lenses were then placed in vials with 1.5 mL of artificial tear solution containing I-labeled albumin for 16 hours at 37°C with shaking. Four uncoated lenses of each type were used as controls. Lenses soaked in radiolabeled albumin were rinsed in a phosphate-buffered saline solution, and radioactive counts were measured directly on lenses using a gamma counter. Albumin uptake on lenses was measured using a calibration curve by plotting radioactive counts versus protein concentration.

RESULTS:

Results are reported as mean ± SD. Lysozyme-coated etafilcon A lenses exhibited lower levels of deposited albumin than uncoated etafilcon A lenses (58 ± 12 vs. 84 ± 5 ng/lens; P < .05). There were no differences in albumin adsorption between control (uncoated) and lysozyme-coated polymacon (105 ± 10 vs. 110 ± 34 ng/lens), nelfilcon A (51 ± 7 vs. 42 ± 20 ng/lens), omafilcon A (90 ± 20 vs. 80 ± 38 ng/lens), ocufilcon B (87 ± 20 vs. 115 ± 50 ng/lens), and nesofilcon A (170 ± 29 vs. 161 ± 10 ng/lens) lens materials (P > .05). Uncoated nesofilcon A lenses deposited the highest amount of albumin when compared with other uncoated lenses (P < .05).

CONCLUSIONS:

This study demonstrates that lysozyme deposited onto etafilcon A resists the deposition of albumin, which may potentially be beneficial to CL wearers.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Muramidase / Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Hidrogéis / Albuminas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Assunto da revista: OPTOMETRIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Muramidase / Lentes de Contato Hidrofílicas / Hidrogéis / Albuminas Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Optom Vis Sci Assunto da revista: OPTOMETRIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article