Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Co-registration of cone beam CT and preoperative MRI for improved accuracy of electrode localization following cochlear implantation.
Dragovic, A S; Stringer, A K; Campbell, L; Shaul, C; O'Leary, S J; Briggs, R J.
Afiliação
  • Dragovic AS; a Department of Otolaryngology , The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
  • Stringer AK; a Department of Otolaryngology , The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
  • Campbell L; b Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery , The University of Melbourne , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
  • Shaul C; a Department of Otolaryngology , The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
  • O'Leary SJ; a Department of Otolaryngology , The Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
  • Briggs RJ; b Otolaryngology, Department of Surgery , The University of Melbourne , 32 Gisborne St, East Melbourne 3002 , Victoria , Australia.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 19(3): 147-152, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29345557
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical usefulness and practicality of co-registration of Cone Beam CT (CBCT) with preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) for intracochlear localization of electrodes after cochlear implantation. METHODS: Images of 20 adult patients who underwent CBCT after implantation were co-registered with preoperative MRI scans. Time taken for co-registration was recorded. The images were analysed by clinicians of varying levels of expertise to determine electrode position and ease of interpretation. RESULTS: After a short learning curve, the average co-registration time was 10.78 minutes (StdDev 2.37). All clinicians found the co-registered images easier to interpret than CBCT alone. The mean concordance of CBCT vs. co-registered image analysis between consultant otologists was 60% (17-100%) and 86% (60-100%), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for CBCT to identify Scala Vestibuli insertion or translocation was 100 and 75%, respectively. The negative predictive value was 100%. DISCUSSION: CBCT should be performed following adult cochlear implantation for audit and quality control of surgical technique. If SV insertion or translocation is suspected, co-registration with preoperative MRI should be performed to enable easier analysis. There will be a learning curve for this process in terms of both the co-registration and the interpretation of images by clinicians.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Implantes Cocleares / Eletrodos Implantados / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico / Otorrinolaringologistas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cochlear Implants Int Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Implantes Cocleares / Eletrodos Implantados / Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico / Otorrinolaringologistas Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Cochlear Implants Int Assunto da revista: AUDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Austrália