Ability of Exhaled Nitric Oxide to Discriminate for Airflow Obstruction Among Frequent Exacerbators of Clinically Diagnosed Asthma.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) has been proposed as a non-invasive biomarker for allergic inflammation seen in asthma. Many asthmatics in clinical practice have never had spirometry and recent data report misdiagnoses in patients with physician diagnosed (PD) asthma. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of FENO to discriminate between those with and without airflow obstruction (AO) among patients with PD-asthma. METHODS: Frequent exacerbators of PD-asthma (with 2 or more asthma exacerbations leading to emergency room visit or hospitalization within last 12 months) were enrolled. All patients underwent diagnostic evaluations including spirometry, FENO testing and serum immunoglobulin (IgE) and eosinophils. Serial spirometry and methacholine challenge testing (MCT) were performed as indicated. AO was defined by a decreased FEV1/FVC ratio (< 70% and/or < LLN), or a positive MCT. RESULTS: Of the 222 patients with PD-asthma, AO was found in 136 (vs. 86 without AO). 81.6% of patients with AO and 66.2% without AO completed FENO testing. There was no significant difference in the mean FENO levels among patients with or without AO (40.8 vs. 30.4 ppb, P = 0.10). Likewise, there was no difference in the serum IgE levels and serum eosinophils. CONCLUSIONS: Our analyses suggest that FENO levels do not help discriminate between those with and without AO in patients with PD-asthma. Patients who experience symptoms of asthma may have elevated FENO levels above the suggested cut points of 20-25 ppb. Objective confirmation of AO should be considered in all patients with PD-asthma, irrespective of FENO levels.