Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ureteroscopic Management of Large ≥2 cm Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Comprehensive 23-Year Experience.
Scotland, Kymora B; Kleinmann, Nir; Cason, Dillon; Hubbard, Logan; Tanimoto, Ryuta; Healy, Kelly A; Hubosky, Scott G; Bagley, Demetrius H.
Afiliação
  • Scotland KB; Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
  • Kleinmann N; Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
  • Cason D; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Hubbard L; Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Tanimoto R; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.
  • Healy KA; Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY.
  • Hubosky SG; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Bagley DH; Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Demetrius.Bagleyjr@jefferson.edu.
Urology ; 121: 66-73, 2018 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29964129
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the effectiveness of ureteroscopy (URS) with laser ablation as an alternative treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) lesions larger than 2 cm. Traditionally, patients with large UTUC are treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). However, in patients with pre-existing renal disease, a solitary kidney, or those who decline RNU, management of UTUC may prove challenging

METHODS:

An institutional database review identified 80 patients with biopsy proven low-grade UTUC who had at least one lesion larger than 2 cm. We collected clinical data including demographics, operative parameters, and pathologic features. Follow-up for all patients was standardized and included cystoscopy and URS every 3 months until clear, every 6 months through the fifth year, and yearly thereafter. We calculated rates of recurrence, progression, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

In total, 86 unique lesions ≥2cm were identified in the 80 qualifying patients; mean tumor size was 3.04 cm. Median follow-up was 43.6 months. During follow-up of patients treated curatively, 90.5% of tumors had ipsilateral recurrence and 31.7% progressed in grade at a median of 26.3 months. RNU was performed in 16 patients (20%); mean time to surgery was 23.2 months. Overall survival was 75%, and cancer specific survival was 84% at 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION:

Under strict surveillance, ureteroscopic management of large (≥ 2cm) UTUC lesions is a viable treatment alternative to RNU. While recurrence is common, URS can potentially preserve renal units in patients with large lesions.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Ureterais / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Nefroureterectomia / Nefropatias / Neoplasias Renais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Neoplasias Ureterais / Carcinoma de Células de Transição / Nefroureterectomia / Nefropatias / Neoplasias Renais / Recidiva Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Urology Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá