Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Risk of eclampsia or HELLP-syndrome by institution availability and place of delivery - A population-based cohort study.
Engjom, Hilde M; Morken, Nils-Halvdan; Høydahl, Even; Norheim, Ole F; Klungsøyr, Kari.
Afiliação
  • Engjom HM; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway. Electronic address: hilde.engjom@uib.no.
  • Morken NH; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway; Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
  • Høydahl E; Department of Population Statistics, Statistics Norway, Oslo, Norway.
  • Norheim OF; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway; Department for Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Norway.
  • Klungsøyr K; Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Norway; Division of Health Data and Digitalisation, The Norwegian Institute for Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Pregnancy Hypertens ; 14: 1-8, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527094
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the association between availability of obstetric institutions and risk of eclampsia, HELLP-syndrome, or delivery before 35 gestational weeks in preeclamptic pregnancies. STUDY

DESIGN:

National population-based retrospective cohort study of deliveries in Norway, 1999-2009 (n = 636738) using data from The Medical Birth Registry of Norway and Statistics Norway. Main exposures were institution availability, measured by travel time to the nearest obstetric institution, and place of delivery. We computed relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using travel time ≤1 h as reference. We stratified analyses by parity and preeclampsia, and adjusted for socio-demographic and medical risk factors. Successive deliveries were linked using the national identification number.

RESULTS:

We identified 1387 eclampsia/HELLP cases (0.2%) and 3004 (0.5%) deliveries before 35 weeks in preeclamptic pregnancies. Nulliparous women living >1 h from any obstetric institution had 50% increased risk of eclampsia/HELLP (0.50 versus 0.35%, adjusted RR 1.5; 95 %CI 1.1-1.9). Parous women living >1 h from emergency institutions had a doubled risk of eclampsia (0.6‰ versus 0.3‰, adjusted RR 2.0; 1.2-3.3). Women without preeclampsia in the present pregnancy or history of preeclampsia constituted all eclampsia/HELLP cases in midwife-led institutions, 39-50% of cases in emergency institutions, and 78% of cases (135/173) in subsequent deliveries. Women with risk factors delivered in the emergency institutions, indicating well-implemented selective referral.

CONCLUSION:

The study shows the importance of available obstetric institutions. Policymakers and clinicians should consider the distribution of potential benefits and burdens when planning and evaluating the obstetric health service structure.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidado Pré-Natal / Síndrome HELLP / Parto Obstétrico / Eclampsia / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pregnancy Hypertens Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidado Pré-Natal / Síndrome HELLP / Parto Obstétrico / Eclampsia / Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pregnancy Hypertens Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article