Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Complementary low-level laser therapy for breast cancer-related lymphedema: a pilot, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.
Kilmartin, Laurie; Denham, Tara; Fu, Mei R; Yu, Gary; Kuo, Ting-Ting; Axelrod, Deborah; Guth, Amber A.
Afiliação
  • Kilmartin L; Rusk Rehabilitation, Ambulatory Care Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Denham T; Rusk Rehabilitation, Ambulatory Care Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Fu MR; Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 4th Floor, Room 424, New York, NY, 10010, USA. mf67@nyu.edu.
  • Yu G; Rory Meyers College of Nursing, New York University, 433 First Avenue, 4th Floor, Room 424, New York, NY, 10010, USA.
  • Kuo TT; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Axelrod D; Department of Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
  • Guth AA; NYU Clinical Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lasers Med Sci ; 35(1): 95-105, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31079232
ABSTRACT
This pilot, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) as a complementary treatment to complete decongestive therapy (CDT) treating lymphedema among breast cancer patients for 12 months post-intervention. Study population was breast cancer patients who were diagnosed and referred to lymphedema clinic for CDT. Participants (n = 22) were randomized and assigned into either an active laser intervention group or an inactive laser placebo-control group. Active LLLT was administered to participants twice a week at the beginning of each CDT session. Outcome measures included lymphedema symptoms, symptom distress, and limb volume by an infrared perometer. Participants in the active and placebo laser groups were comparable in demographic and clinical predictors of lymphedema. In comparison with the placebo group (83.3%), significantly fewer participants in the active laser group (55.6%) reported more than one lymphedema symptom (p = 0.012) at 12 months post-intervention. Significantly, more patients in the active laser group (44.4%) reported less than two impaired limb mobility symptoms in comparison with the placebo group (33.3%) at 12 months post-intervention (p = 0.017). The active laser group had statistically significant improvements in symptom distress of sadness (p = 0.005) from 73 to 11% and self-perception (p = 0.030) from 36 to 0% over time from baseline to 12-months post-intervention. There was no significant reduction in limb volume. Findings of the trial demonstrated significant benefits of complementary LLLT for relieving symptoms and improvement of emotional distress in breast cancer patients with lymphedema.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade / Linfedema Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Assunto da revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade / Linfedema Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lasers Med Sci Assunto da revista: BIOTECNOLOGIA / RADIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos