Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing apathy in multiple sclerosis: Validation of the dimensional apathy scale and comparison with apathy evaluation scale.
Raimo, S; Trojano, L; Gaita, M; Spitaleri, D; Santangelo, G.
Afiliação
  • Raimo S; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Graecia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Viale Ellittico, 31, Caserta 81100, Italy; IRCCS Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
  • Trojano L; Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Viale Ellittico, 31, Caserta 81100, Italy.
  • Gaita M; Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Viale Ellittico, 31, Caserta 81100, Italy.
  • Spitaleri D; Neurology Unit "San Giuseppe Moscati," Hospital Avellino, Avellino, Italy.
  • Santangelo G; Department of Psychology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli," Viale Ellittico, 31, Caserta 81100, Italy. Electronic address: gabriella.santangelo@unicampania.it.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 38: 101870, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31830701
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Apathy is a predictor of cognitive decline in the course of multiple sclerosis (MS). Early identification of apathetic patients is relevant in clinical settings.

OBJECTIVE:

To assess applicability and psychometric properties of the self-rated version of the Dimensional Apathy Scale (DAS) in a large cohort of patients with MS and to compare its diagnosing accuracy with that of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES).

METHODS:

One hundred and twenty-four patients underwent clinical interview based on diagnostic criteria for apathy, DAS, AES, and assessment of depression, global cognitive functioning, and non-verbal intelligence.

RESULTS:

According to diagnostic criteria, apathy occurred in 33.4% of the patients. The DAS showed high consistency, and good convergent, discriminant and criterion validity. Factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure executive, behavioural and emotional apathy. Unlike AES, no significant association between DAS score and severity of neurological disability (expressed by EDSS total score) was found, suggesting that the DAS might be less related to levels of disability. Receiver operating characteristics analyses, with clinical diagnostic criteria for apathy as the gold standard, revealed that a DAS score of 28/29 and an AES score of 35/36 were optimal cut-off values for identifying clinically relevant apathy. The two scales had similar diagnostic accuracy in the present sample.

CONCLUSIONS:

The DAS is a valid and reliable multidimensional tool to assess apathy in MS, with diagnostic accuracy similar to that of the AES. However, the DAS score appears to be less strongly related to neurological disability.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica / Psicometria / Sintomas Comportamentais / Apatia / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Relat Disord Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica / Psicometria / Sintomas Comportamentais / Apatia / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Mult Scler Relat Disord Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália