Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.
Knaapila, Juha; Autio, Venla; Jambor, Ivan; Ettala, Otto; Verho, Janne; Kiviniemi, Aida; Taimen, Pekka; Perez, Ileana Montoya; Aronen, Hannu J; Syvänen, Kari T; Boström, Peter J.
Afiliação
  • Knaapila J; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Autio V; Department of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland.
  • Jambor I; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Ettala O; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Verho J; Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
  • Kiviniemi A; Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Taimen P; Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Perez IM; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Aronen HJ; Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Syvänen KT; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
  • Boström PJ; Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Scand J Urol ; 54(1): 7-13, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31914846
ABSTRACT

Background:

The objective of this study was to compare the prevalence of clinically significant prostate cancer (CSPCa) in men with biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and lesion-targeted biopsies (TBs) to the group of men without prebiopsy MRI in an initial biopsy session.

Methods:

The MRI group consists of men enrolled into four prospective clinical trials investigating a biparametric MRI (bpMRI) and TB while the non-MRI group was a retrospective cohort of men collected from an era prior to a clinical use of a prostate MRI. All men had standard biopsies (SBs). In the MRI group, men had additional TBs from potential cancer-suspicious lesions. CSPCa was defined as Gleason score ≥3 + 4 in any biopsy core taken. All the patients were prostate biopsy naïve.

Results:

The MRI group consists of 507 while the non-MRI group 379 men. Mean age and prostate specific antigen (PSA) level differed significantly (p < 0.05) between the groups In the MRI group, 64 years and 7.6 ng/ml, respectively, and in the non-MRI group 68 years and 8.2 ng/ml, respectively. Significantly (p < 0.05) more CSPCa was diagnosed with initial biopsies in the MRI group (48%) compared to non-MRI group (34%). In men with no CSPCa diagnosed during the initial biopsies, significantly fewer (p < 0.05) men had upgrading re-biopsies in the MRI group (5%) than in the non-MRI group (19%) during the follow up.

Conclusions:

Prebiopsy bpMRI with TBs combined with SBs could lead to earlier diagnoses of CSPCa compared with men without prebiopsy prostate MRI used in initial PCa diagnostics.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Próstata / Neoplasias da Próstata / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética Multiparamétrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Urol Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Finlândia