Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Resting motor threshold and magnetic field output of the figure-of-8 and the double-cone coil.
Schecklmann, Martin; Schmaußer, Maximilian; Klinger, Felix; Kreuzer, Peter M; Krenkel, Lars; Langguth, Berthold.
Afiliação
  • Schecklmann M; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany. martin.schecklmann@medbo.de.
  • Schmaußer M; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Klinger F; Fakultät Maschinenbau, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Kreuzer PM; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Krenkel L; Fakultät Maschinenbau, Ostbayerische Technische Hochschule, Regensburg, Germany.
  • Langguth B; Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 1644, 2020 02 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32015398
The use of the double-cone (DC) coil in transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is promoted with the notion that the DC coil enables stimulation of deeper brain areas in contrast to conventional figure-of-8 (Fo8) coils. However, systematic comparisons of these two coil types with respect to the spatial distribution of the magnetic field output and also to the induced activity in superficial and deeper brain areas are limited. Resting motor thresholds of the left and right first dorsal interosseous (FDI) and tibialis anterior (TA) were determined with the DC and the Fo8 coil in 17 healthy subjects. Coils were orientated over the corresponding motor area in an angle of 45 degrees for the hand area with the handle pointing in posterior direction and in medio-lateral direction for the leg area. Physical measurements were done with an automatic gantry table using a Gaussmeter. Resting motor threshold was higher for the leg area in contrast to the hand area and for the Fo8 in contrast to the DC coil. Muscle by coil interaction was also significant providing higher differences between leg and hand area for the Fo8 (about 27%) in contrast to the DC coil (about 15%). Magnetic field strength was higher for the DC coil in contrast to the Fo8 coil. The DC coil produces a higher magnetic field with higher depth of penetration than the figure of eight coil.

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha