Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Participatory implementation research in the field of migrant health: Sustainable changes and ripple effects over time.
van den Muijsenbergh, Maria E T C; LeMaster, Joseph W; Shahiri, Parmida; Brouwer, Michelle; Hussain, Mohammed; Dowrick, Chris; Papadakaki, Maria; Lionis, Christos; MacFarlane, Anne.
Afiliação
  • van den Muijsenbergh METC; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • LeMaster JW; Centre of Expertise on Health Disparities, Pharos, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Shahiri P; University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Brouwer M; University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
  • Hussain M; Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • Dowrick C; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Papadakaki M; Graduate Entry Medical School and Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
  • Lionis C; Department of Health Services Research, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
  • MacFarlane A; Department of Social Work, Hellenic Mediterranean University, Heraklion, Greece.
Health Expect ; 23(2): 306-317, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32035009
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to explore whether positive impacts were sustained and unanticipated ripple effects had occurred four years after the implementation of interventions to improve cross-cultural communication in primary care.

BACKGROUND:

Sustaining the implementation of change using complex interventions is challenging. The EU-funded "RESTORE" study implemented guidelines and training on cross-cultural communication in five Primary Care sites in Europe, combining implementation theory (Normalisation Process Theory) with participatory methodology (participatory learning and action-PLA). There were positive impacts on knowledge, skills and clinical routines. DESIGN, SETTING AND

PARTICIPANTS:

Four of the five original sites (England, Ireland, Greece, The Netherlands) were available for this qualitative follow-up study. The study population (N = 44) was primary healthcare staff and migrants, most of whom had participated in RESTORE. INTERVENTION; MAIN OUTCOME

MEASURES:

PLA-style focus groups and interviews explored routine practice during consultations with migrants. Etic cards based on the effects of RESTORE stimulated the discussion. Deductive framework analysis was performed in each country followed by comparative data analysis and synthesis.

RESULTS:

Changes in knowledge, attitudes and behaviour with regard to consultations with migrants were sustained and migrants felt empowered by their participation in RESTORE. There were ongoing concerns about macro level factors, like the political climate and financial policies, negatively affecting migrant healthcare.

CONCLUSION:

There were sustained effects in clinical settings, and additional unanticipated positive ripple effects, due in part, from the participatory approach employed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Migrantes Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Migrantes Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Health Expect Assunto da revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE / SAUDE PUBLICA Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda