Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prophylactic use of acid suppressants in adult acutely ill hospitalised patients: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.
Marker, Søren; Barbateskovic, Marija; Perner, Anders; Wetterslev, Jørn; Jakobsen, Janus C; Krag, Mette; Granholm, Anders; Anthon, Carl T; Møller, Morten H.
Afiliação
  • Marker S; Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Barbateskovic M; Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Perner A; Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Wetterslev J; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Jakobsen JC; Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Krag M; Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Granholm A; Centre for Research in Intensive Care (CRIC), Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Anthon CT; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Møller MH; Copenhagen Trial Unit, Centre for Clinical Intervention Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 64(6): 714-728, 2020 07.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32060905
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Acutely ill patients are at risk of stress-related gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding and prophylactic acid suppressants are frequently used. In this systematic review, we assessed the effects of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) versus placebo or no prophylaxis in acutely ill hospitalised patients.

METHODS:

We conducted the review according to the PRISMA statement, the Cochrane Handbook and GRADE, using conventional meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA). The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, clinically important GI bleeding and serious adverse events (SAEs). The primary analyses included overall low risk of bias trials.

RESULTS:

We included 65 comparisons from 62 trials (n = 9713); 43 comparisons were from intensive care units. Only three trials (n = 3596) had overall low risk of bias. We did not find an effect on all-cause mortality (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.14; TSA-adjusted CI 0.90 to 1.18; high certainty). The rate of clinically important GI bleeding was lower with SUP (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.89; TSA-adjusted CI 0.14 to 2.81; moderate certainty). We did not find a difference in pneumonia rates (moderate certainty). Effects on SAEs, Clostridium difficile enteritis, myocardial ischaemia and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were inconclusive due to sparse data. Analyses of all trials regardless of risk of bias were consistent with the primary analyses.

CONCLUSIONS:

We did not observe a difference in all-cause mortality or pneumonia with SUP. The incidence of clinically important GI bleeding was reduced with SUP, whereas any effects on SAEs, myocardial ischaemia, Clostridium difficile enteritis and HRQoL were inconclusive. STUDY REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration number CRD42017055676; published study protocol Marker, et al 2017 in Systematic Reviews.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Críticos / Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal / Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina / Pacientes Internados / Antiulcerosos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidados Críticos / Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons / Hemorragia Gastrointestinal / Antagonistas dos Receptores H2 da Histamina / Pacientes Internados / Antiulcerosos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca